| Revision as of 02:19, 13 November 2014 view sourceRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits magic word← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:08, 13 November 2014 view source Tarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Torga: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ::: I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) ] (]) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ::: I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) ] (]) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::::NBSB didn't request that IP be sanctioned, only that the page be protected. However, it is all moot now. ] — ] 02:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ::::NBSB didn't request that IP be sanctioned, only that the page be protected. However, it is all moot now. ] — ] 02:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Torga == | |||
| ==Torga== | |||
| <small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br>Requests may not exceed 500 ] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small> | |||
| ===Request concerning Torga=== | |||
| ; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|Tarc}} 13:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Torga}}<p>{{ds/log|Torga}} | |||
| <!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. ---> | |||
| ;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: ] : | |||
| <!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced ---> | |||
| ; ] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it : | |||
| <!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. --> | |||
| # Post #1 to ] | |||
| # Post #2 to ] | |||
| ; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any : | |||
| <!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.--> | |||
| # Notified of discretionary sanctions. | |||
| # Topic-banned from Gamergate for 90 days. | |||
| ;If ] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see ]): | |||
| <!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. --> | |||
| *Previously blocked as a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict, see the block log linked to above. | |||
| *Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on by {{admin|Dreadstar}}. | |||
| *Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above. | |||
| *Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on | |||
| ; Additional comments by editor filing complaint : | |||
| <!-- Add any further comment here --> | |||
| I think it's pretty straight-forward; user continues to post to the talk page of Gamergate controversy after a topic-ban was handed down. Hopefully this all comes out right, I have never filed one of these before, and cribbed some of the lines from ], as what's at the top of the talk page wasn't easily copies here in wiki-markup. ] (]) 13:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested : | |||
| <!-- Please notify the user against whom you request enforcement of the request, and then replace this comment with a diff of the notification. The request will normally not be processed otherwise. --> | |||
| . | |||
| <!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. ---> | |||
| ===Discussion concerning Torga=== | |||
| <small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 ] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br>Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small> | |||
| ====Statement by Torga==== | |||
| ====Statement by (username)==== | |||
| <!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. --> | |||
| ===Result concerning Torga=== | |||
| <!-- Use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}} to mark this request as closed.--> | |||
| <small>''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.''</small> | |||
Revision as of 13:08, 13 November 2014
Notice of obsolescence:
Community sanctions in this area of conflict have been superseded by an Arbitration Committee sanctions regime. As a result, this community sanctions-related page is now obsolete, is retained only for historical reference, and should not be modified. For more information about Arbitration Committee sanctions, see this page. For the specific Committee decision that rescinded or modified these community sanctions, see WP:ARBGG.
Video game journalism
| Matter resolved. 01:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The Video game journalism article is currently under attack by an anonymous IP repeatedly inserting discredited and specious claims about a living person related to the controversy, while refusing to engage in discussion on the talk page. Needs semi-protection. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
|
- I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) Tutelary (talk) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- NBSB didn't request that IP be sanctioned, only that the page be protected. However, it is all moot now. RGloucester — ☎ 02:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'd like to note that if this wasn't resolved in the manner that it was, the IP could not have been sanctioned as they have not been noticed of general sanctions. (Unsure where to put this as there isn't a talk page for this sub page) Tutelary (talk) 02:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Torga
Torga
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below.
Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Request concerning Torga
- User who is submitting this request for enforcement
- Tarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 13:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- User against whom enforcement is requested
- Torga (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Search CT alerts: in user talk history • in system log
- Sanction or remedy to be enforced
- Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Gamergate :
- Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
- 13 Nov, 2014 Post #1 to Talk:Gamergate controversy
- 13 Nov, 2014 Post #2 to Talk:Gamergate controversy
- Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any
- 27 Oct, 2014 Notified of discretionary sanctions.
- 11 Nov, 2014 Topic-banned from Gamergate for 90 days.
- If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts)
- Previously blocked as a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict, see the block log linked to above.
- Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on 11 Nov, 2014 by Dreadstar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA).
- Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above.
- Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on 27 Oct, 2014
- Additional comments by editor filing complaint
I think it's pretty straight-forward; user continues to post to the talk page of Gamergate controversy after a topic-ban was handed down. Hopefully this all comes out right, I have never filed one of these before, and cribbed some of the lines from WP:AE, as what's at the top of the talk page wasn't easily copies here in wiki-markup. Tarc (talk) 13:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested
Discussion concerning Torga
Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.
Statement by Torga
Statement by (username)
Result concerning Torga
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
Categories: