Revision as of 16:40, 6 March 2006 editDawson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,948 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:00, 12 July 2006 edit undoDavidmichell (talk | contribs)5 edits Coral Snake Page VandalisedNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and ] agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -] 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | :Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and ] agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -] 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Coral Snake Page Vandalised == | |||
Hi, | |||
This page has been vandalised. | |||
Can someone please correct it. | |||
Thanks and regards, | |||
David |
Revision as of 09:00, 12 July 2006
um, this is a good article-User:Carsoncocars
look at the copperhead page. It would be nice if articles on snakes all followed that format. Much easier to read.
- Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and WP:Guide to writing better articles agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -Dawson 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Coral Snake Page Vandalised
Hi, This page has been vandalised. Can someone please correct it. Thanks and regards, David