Misplaced Pages

Talk:Biology and sexual orientation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:42, 7 May 2002 editMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 edits note on title← Previous edit Revision as of 15:33, 7 May 2002 edit undoMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 editsm note on nameNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
This statement doesn't logically follow the findings of these studies; which have shown that 1) there is a possible sexual-orientation dimorphism (difference in the size of a part of the brain), 2) the sexual orientation of identical twins seems to follow a predictable pattern once the orientation of one twin is known, and 3) there is a cetain gene that tends to follow individuals who identify as homosexual. --] This statement doesn't logically follow the findings of these studies; which have shown that 1) there is a possible sexual-orientation dimorphism (difference in the size of a part of the brain), 2) the sexual orientation of identical twins seems to follow a predictable pattern once the orientation of one twin is known, and 3) there is a cetain gene that tends to follow individuals who identify as homosexual. --]


In addition, the current title of the article misses the point -- only one of these studies really deals with genetics. The other two deal with phenotypes -- which arise from the interaction of genes, the chemical environment of the body, the outside environment and self-identification. A MUCH better title would be ]. If there is such a thing as a 'gay gene' (or more likely ''genes'') there is every reason to believe that it/they has/have some degree of ''influence'' on sexual orientation that is somehow "set" in early to late adolescence (thus its supposed "innateness"). --] In addition, the current title of the article misses the point -- only one of these studies really deals with genetics. The other two deal with phenotypes and behavior -- which arise from varying degrees of interaction between genes, the chemical environment of the body, the outside environment, self-identification, etc. A MUCH better title would be ]. If there is such a thing as a 'gay gene' (or more likely ''genes'') there is every reason to believe that it/they has/have some degree of ''influence'' on sexual orientation that is somehow "set" in early to late adolescence (thus its supposed "innateness"). --]

Revision as of 15:33, 7 May 2002

removed from article:

These studies show that there is no scientific data to support a genetic or biologic basis for same-sex attractions.

This statement doesn't logically follow the findings of these studies; which have shown that 1) there is a possible sexual-orientation dimorphism (difference in the size of a part of the brain), 2) the sexual orientation of identical twins seems to follow a predictable pattern once the orientation of one twin is known, and 3) there is a cetain gene that tends to follow individuals who identify as homosexual. --maveric149

In addition, the current title of the article misses the point -- only one of these studies really deals with genetics. The other two deal with phenotypes and behavior -- which arise from varying degrees of interaction between genes, the chemical environment of the body, the outside environment, self-identification, etc. A MUCH better title would be innate basis of sexual orientation. If there is such a thing as a 'gay gene' (or more likely genes) there is every reason to believe that it/they has/have some degree of influence on sexual orientation that is somehow "set" in early to late adolescence (thus its supposed "innateness"). --maveric149