| Revision as of 02:58, 1 December 2014 edit108.41.160.197 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:58, 1 December 2014 edit undo108.41.160.197 (talk) →Audrey BitoniNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Keep''' - I disagree with the notion that Audrey Bitoni is a "non-notable" pornstar. She's been around since 2006. She's made 234 titles as per IAFD, including scenes for elite companies such as Brazzers and Bangbros. Her twitter page has 134,000 followers even though she never responds to her fans' tweets (For reference, Gracie Glam has 91,000 followers on twitter). She has an AVN Award nomination for Best New Starlet. The cited sources are mostly interviews, some of which are even videos (So you have direct, visual proof). ] (]) 23:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Redban | *'''Keep''' - I disagree with the notion that Audrey Bitoni is a "non-notable" pornstar. She's been around since 2006. She's made 234 titles as per IAFD, including scenes for elite companies such as Brazzers and Bangbros. Her twitter page has 134,000 followers even though she never responds to her fans' tweets (For reference, Gracie Glam has 91,000 followers on twitter). She has an AVN Award nomination for Best New Starlet. The cited sources are mostly interviews, some of which are even videos (So you have direct, visual proof). ] (]) 23:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Redban | ||
| :That direct visual "proof" is a promotional video from ], falling under ]. ] (]) 00:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC) | :That direct visual "proof" is a promotional video from ], falling under ]. ] (]) 00:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::The ZZinsider video is hardly "promotional." Is there a reasonable cause to believe she lied in that interview, given the general tone and the non-sexual answer relating to her name's origin? It's not as though the interview was part of a porn flick. Furthermore, |
::The ZZinsider video is hardly "promotional." Is there a reasonable cause to believe she lied in that interview, given the general tone and the non-sexual answer relating to her name's origin? It's not as though the interview was part of a porn flick. Furthermore, her page uses many other interview sources from radioshows, magazines, and internet sites.] (]) 02:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Redban | ||
| *'''Weak Keep''' - I wish that a performer who has this many videos and brushes with various awards had accomplished more, but on Misplaced Pages popularity is not enough. I'll do some looking for content, but if I can't find anything worthwhile, I will change this to Delete. --] ] ☮ღ☺ 00:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Weak Keep''' - I wish that a performer who has this many videos and brushes with various awards had accomplished more, but on Misplaced Pages popularity is not enough. I'll do some looking for content, but if I can't find anything worthwhile, I will change this to Delete. --] ] ☮ღ☺ 00:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:58, 1 December 2014
Audrey Bitoni
AfDs for this article:- Audrey Bitoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable pornographic actress whose article is supported by poor sources. Fails both PORNBIO in that her "awards" are not significant and the general notability guidelines due to the paucity of reliable sources that exist for her. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with the notion that Audrey Bitoni is a "non-notable" pornstar. She's been around since 2006. She's made 234 titles as per IAFD, including scenes for elite companies such as Brazzers and Bangbros. Her twitter page has 134,000 followers even though she never responds to her fans' tweets (For reference, Gracie Glam has 91,000 followers on twitter). She has an AVN Award nomination for Best New Starlet. The cited sources are mostly interviews, some of which are even videos (So you have direct, visual proof). Redban (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Redban
- That direct visual "proof" is a promotional video from Brazzers, falling under WP:NOTRELIABLE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- The ZZinsider video is hardly "promotional." Is there a reasonable cause to believe she lied in that interview, given the general tone and the non-sexual answer relating to her name's origin? It's not as though the interview was part of a porn flick. Furthermore, her page uses many other interview sources from radioshows, magazines, and internet sites.108.41.160.197 (talk) 02:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Redban
- Weak Keep - I wish that a performer who has this many videos and brushes with various awards had accomplished more, but on Misplaced Pages popularity is not enough. I'll do some looking for content, but if I can't find anything worthwhile, I will change this to Delete. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 00:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)