Revision as of 07:02, 27 November 2014 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid/Archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:02, 3 December 2014 edit undoUnbroken Chain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,193 edits Adding new report for Pearljambandaid. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Pearljambandaid}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Pearljambandaid}} | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
=====<big>03 December 2014</big>===== | |||
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
* {{checkuser|1=HiLikePlanes}} | |||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
* | |||
For the same reason as before, new account knows intinately about the inner workings of the industry which was a tell from the last SPI. Revdel evidence from the case page should help, the other thing you should look at ] the eighties comment reference ]. Coincidence? Maybe but then his second edit after that is to comment delete on the SMH record which would follow whatever fued between those sock/meat puppets have going on. SO block evasion and afd manipulation ] (]) 15:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 15:02, 3 December 2014
Pearljambandaid
Pearljambandaid (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid/Archive.
03 December 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- HiLikePlanes (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
For the same reason as before, new account knows intinately about the inner workings of the industry which was a tell from the last SPI. Revdel evidence from the case page should help, the other thing you should look at ] the eighties comment reference ]. Coincidence? Maybe but then his second edit after that is to comment delete on the SMH record which would follow whatever fued between those sock/meat puppets have going on. SO block evasion and afd manipulation Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: