Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/SirIsaacBrock: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:29, 13 July 2006 editSirIsaacBrock (talk | contribs)4,327 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:09, 13 July 2006 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits SirIsaacBrock: listed, rm tagNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
* {{checkip|70.51.198.36}} * {{checkip|70.51.198.36}}
* {{checkuser|WritersCramp}} * {{checkuser|WritersCramp}}

This user appears to have a long history of utilizing sockpuppets and IPs disruptively on Misplaced Pages. Despite an overwhelming amount of evidence this user has denied utilizing sockpuppets and now is facing the possibility of an ''Exhausted the community's patience'' ban that would be bolstered by confirmation of the sockpuppetry herein alleged. Please see the entirety of ] and in particular ArbCom clerk ]'s commentary toward the bottom. Additionally, ] is of pertinency to this case. Thanks. ''(]])'' 17:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC) This user appears to have a long history of utilizing sockpuppets and IPs disruptively on Misplaced Pages. Despite an overwhelming amount of evidence this user has denied utilizing sockpuppets and now is facing the possibility of an ''Exhausted the community's patience'' ban that would be bolstered by confirmation of the sockpuppetry herein alleged. Please see the entirety of ] and in particular ArbCom clerk ]'s commentary toward the bottom. Additionally, ] is of pertinency to this case. Thanks. ''(]])'' 17:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


Line 11: Line 12:
::The IP in particular ''is'' slightly difficult but certainly ] to have been used by the editor in question. It has signicant ''pertinence'' as to whether or not the blocked editor was utilizing it toward block evasion ends. ''(]])'' 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC) ::The IP in particular ''is'' slightly difficult but certainly ] to have been used by the editor in question. It has signicant ''pertinence'' as to whether or not the blocked editor was utilizing it toward block evasion ends. ''(]])'' 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Other than to pursue other possible sockpuppets relative to ] checking if that was a sockpuppet of ] is not needed, as by ] establishes that ] was indeed his sockpuppet despite his previous denials. ''(]])'' 18:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC) :::Other than to pursue other possible sockpuppets relative to ] checking if that was a sockpuppet of ] is not needed, as by ] establishes that ] was indeed his sockpuppet despite his previous denials. ''(]])'' 18:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

<!--Please do not remove the following tag until this case has been listed on RFCU. -->
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Inputbox/Sample/Tag}}</noinclude>


:'''COMMENT''' - These people have been stalking me for ages. I hope they are having fun. ] 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC) :'''COMMENT''' - These people have been stalking me for ages. I hope they are having fun. ] 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:09, 13 July 2006

SirIsaacBrock

This user appears to have a long history of utilizing sockpuppets and IPs disruptively on Misplaced Pages. Despite an overwhelming amount of evidence this user has denied utilizing sockpuppets and now is facing the possibility of an Exhausted the community's patience ban that would be bolstered by confirmation of the sockpuppetry herein alleged. Please see the entirety of this WP:ANI report and in particular ArbCom clerk User:Tony Sidaway's commentary toward the bottom. Additionally, this RfC re: User:WritersCramp is of pertinency to this case. Thanks. (Netscott) 17:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Checkuser is for difficult cases. This is not one. Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
The IP in particular is slightly difficult but certainly appears to have been used by the editor in question. It has signicant pertinence as to whether or not the blocked editor was utilizing it toward block evasion ends. (Netscott) 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Other than to pursue other possible sockpuppets relative to User:Porky Pig checking if that was a sockpuppet of User:SirIsaacBrock is not needed, as this edit by User:SirIsaacBrock establishes that User:Porky Pig was indeed his sockpuppet despite his previous denials. (Netscott) 18:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


COMMENT - These people have been stalking me for ages. I hope they are having fun. SirIsaacBrock 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)