| Revision as of 21:26, 13 July 2006 editSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits /* OH, L<sup>\</sup>@^@<sup>\</sup>K! <font color="#000080" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>N</strong></font><font color="#FF0000" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><strong>scheffey</strong></font> has opini← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:30, 13 July 2006 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits chill!Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Please see ] concerning what you are doing. You are way out of line here. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 21:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | Please see ] concerning what you are doing. You are way out of line here. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 21:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :could you be more specific? ] 21:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | :could you be more specific? ] 21:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hey, just chill. Let people write what they want and ignore the trolls. You can rely on us to ignore the trolls too. ] 21:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:30, 13 July 2006
- To discuss articles, please use the appropriate Discussion page of that article.
- To contact me click on this link
A suggestion from a previously uninvolved admin
Hopefully you won't ignore this. May I suggest that you keep your talk page as others have edited it but with your modifications commented out using the <nowiki> templates and then when you want to read the page, uncomment out your font and size modifiers and use the preview button. This will hopefully make everyone happy. JoshuaZ 04:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Since your an admin and discussing policy (imho), there isn't any reason to ignore your message. About your suggestion, I will take it under consideration. Thanks! :) Ste4k 04:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
OH, L@^@K! Nscheffey has opinions!
Ste4k, I know you don't like people posting on your talk page, but I'm a bit worried that you are misunderstanding the role of administrators on Misplaced Pages. "Since your an admin .... there isn't any reason to ignore your message," suggests that you would ignore messages from regular editors. An admin's opinions, advice, and input are not automatically worth more or more correct than any editor's. Keep that in mind. --Nscheffey 19:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nscheffy, I don't believe that you can know, have known, or ever will know what I have, do, or will like. Do you actually not see how your statement is offensive? Ste4k 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually I don't, (Personal attack removed) --Nscheffey 20:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do you want to speak about that incident that you know nothing about? Or do you want to address the topic that you brought up? Ste4k 20:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- You are completely out of control. Saying I "know nothing" is (Personal attack removed) --Nscheffey 21:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- So you would prefer to digress the matter rather than address it. Ste4k 21:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- You are completely out of control. Saying I "know nothing" is (Personal attack removed) --Nscheffey 21:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do you want to speak about that incident that you know nothing about? Or do you want to address the topic that you brought up? Ste4k 20:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually I don't, (Personal attack removed) --Nscheffey 20:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Course in Miracles
I could not reach you by email but please do not suggest a name change to the "A Course in Miracles" article.Who123 19:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd seriously like to put the entire subject matter behind me. Until doing serious research on this topic, I hadn't ever heard of it, still haven't ever seen any of it mentioned in the media in any serious way, doubt that it has any real significance to world wide politics, religion, society, charities, wars, or anything else that is going to significantly change the planet any time soon. The fact that it does require an enormous amount of research indicates only that it is an obscure topic. That so many editors have so many different viewpoints on the matter only indicates that nobody can reach consensus and that the subject matter is ambiguous. The article along with its neighbors has caused significant amounts of abusive remarks to me for simply researching the matter which indicates that the presence of the article causes more problems than it serves to provide any information. Providing information is the primary objective of the encyclopedia. Consensus is the primary means that this encyclopedia changes it's content. And disambiguity is the primary tool for accomplishing that goal. Ste4k 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
OH, L@^@K! Nscheffey quotes policy!
Please see policy concerning what you are doing. You are way out of line here. --Nscheffey 21:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- could you be more specific? Ste4k 21:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, just chill. Let people write what they want and ignore the trolls. You can rely on us to ignore the trolls too. Just zis Guy you know? 21:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)