Revision as of 05:55, 7 December 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Mba83 - "→Multirotors: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:56, 7 December 2014 edit undoMihaister (talk | contribs)579 edits →Multirotors: reNext edit → | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
I never used the "talk" feature before, so not sure if I'm doing it correctly. Just wanted to let you know that I don't think it's proper terminology to call multirotors "helicopters". They are different types of flying machines/devices <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | I never used the "talk" feature before, so not sure if I'm doing it correctly. Just wanted to let you know that I don't think it's proper terminology to call multirotors "helicopters". They are different types of flying machines/devices <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
:{{replyto|Mba83}} WP defines ] as "a type of rotorcraft in which lift and thrust are supplied by rotors". In my understanding, multirotors fit this definition perfectly. Please explain why you think they do not. ] (]) 16:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:56, 7 December 2014
Welcome!
|
Multirotors
I never used the "talk" feature before, so not sure if I'm doing it correctly. Just wanted to let you know that I don't think it's proper terminology to call multirotors "helicopters". They are different types of flying machines/devices — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mba83 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Mba83: WP defines helicopter as "a type of rotorcraft in which lift and thrust are supplied by rotors". In my understanding, multirotors fit this definition perfectly. Please explain why you think they do not. Mihaister (talk) 16:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)