Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:03, 6 December 2014 editDuffbeerforme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,138 edits revert sock trying to hide himself← Previous edit Revision as of 21:48, 9 December 2014 edit undoMike V (talk | contribs)28,285 edits Marking case as closedNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


=====<big>03 December 2014</big>===== =====<big>03 December 2014</big>=====
{{SPI case status|checked}} {{SPI case status|close}}


;Suspected sockpuppets ;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 25: Line 25:
:*{{checkuser|HiLikePlanes}} :*{{checkuser|HiLikePlanes}}
:The closing admin might wish to take a look ] where I held an article from deletion for an ]. -- ] ] 04:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC) :The closing admin might wish to take a look ] where I held an article from deletion for an ]. -- ] ] 04:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
*All accounts have been blocked and tagged. I'll sort through the promotional links. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 21:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 21:48, 9 December 2014

Pearljambandaid

Pearljambandaid (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid/Archive.



03 December 2014

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

For the same reason as before, new account knows intinately about the inner workings of the industry which was a tell from the last SPI. Revdel evidence from the case page should help, the other thing you should look at ] the eighties comment reference ]. Coincidence? Maybe but then his second edit after that is to comment delete on the SMH record which would follow whatever fued between those sock/meat puppets have going on. SO block evasion and afd manipulation Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. See also Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Causeandedit/Archive duffbeerforme (talk) 02:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Confirmed to each other:
The closing admin might wish to take a look at my userspace where I held an article from deletion for an SPI. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 04:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories: