| Revision as of 14:57, 14 July 2006 editNescio (talk | contribs)11,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:59, 14 July 2006 edit undoNescio (talk | contribs)11,956 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| *Could you withdraw that tendentious comment? Look at the bottom of the page abd then repeat this accusation. Second, the current version is certainly not my version.<font color="green"> ]</font><sup><i><font color="blue"><small>]</small></font></i></sup> 14:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | *Could you withdraw that tendentious comment? Look at the bottom of the page abd then repeat this accusation. Second, the current version is certainly not my version.<font color="green"> ]</font><sup><i><font color="blue"><small>]</small></font></i></sup> 14:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **I would like to point out, Nescio has now stated after the filing of this RfC that he no longer and never did have a problem with 2005 Bali bombings being included. I am not sure why they were removed then because the information I gave at the bottom of the page is the same information located further up the page, a section he replied to. ] This is further proof of what I have had to deal with when this user attempts to "find a concensus", the constantly shifting arguements and views, edits completely contradictory to eachother, and now even stating he never had a problem with it, or removed it because it had no source information, even though its already on the talk page in a section he started. --<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 11pt">]</span> ] 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | **I would like to point out, Nescio has now stated after the filing of this RfC that he no longer and never did have a problem with 2005 Bali bombings being included. I am not sure why they were removed then because the information I gave at the bottom of the page is the same information located further up the page, a section he replied to. ] This is further proof of what I have had to deal with when this user attempts to "find a concensus", the constantly shifting arguements and views, edits completely contradictory to eachother, and now even stating he never had a problem with it, or removed it because it had no source information, even though its already on the talk page in a section he started. --<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 11pt">]</span> ] 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ***While I removed it in error, you removed ] and ] to ] and because you refuse to accept the sources on those articles as evidence.<font color="green"> ]</font><sup><i><font color="blue"><small>]</small></font></i></sup> 14:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | ***While I removed it in error (and never even said I objected to it), you removed ] and ] to ] and because you refuse to accept the sources on those articles as evidence.<font color="green"> ]</font><sup><i><font color="blue"><small>]</small></font></i></sup> 14:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 14 July 2006
I should comment that Nescio has apparently refused any involvement with the Template:War on Terrorism page (he has made no comment on thetalk page) since I protected it. It might or might not be linked to the fact it is his version that happens to be protected. Circeus 14:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Could you withdraw that tendentious comment? Look at the bottom of the page abd then repeat this accusation. Second, the current version is certainly not my version. Nomen Nescio 14:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I would like to point out, Nescio has now stated after the filing of this RfC that he no longer and never did have a problem with 2005 Bali bombings being included. I am not sure why they were removed then because the information I gave at the bottom of the page is the same information located further up the page, a section he replied to. Template_talk:War_on_Terrorism#Addition This is further proof of what I have had to deal with when this user attempts to "find a concensus", the constantly shifting arguements and views, edits completely contradictory to eachother, and now even stating he never had a problem with it, or removed it because it had no source information, even though its already on the talk page in a section he started. --zero faults 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- While I removed it in error (and never even said I objected to it), you removed extraordinary rendition and unitary executive to prove a point and because you refuse to accept the sources on those articles as evidence. Nomen Nescio 14:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I would like to point out, Nescio has now stated after the filing of this RfC that he no longer and never did have a problem with 2005 Bali bombings being included. I am not sure why they were removed then because the information I gave at the bottom of the page is the same information located further up the page, a section he replied to. Template_talk:War_on_Terrorism#Addition This is further proof of what I have had to deal with when this user attempts to "find a concensus", the constantly shifting arguements and views, edits completely contradictory to eachother, and now even stating he never had a problem with it, or removed it because it had no source information, even though its already on the talk page in a section he started. --zero faults 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)