Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Jayden Jaymes: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:56, 16 December 2014 editJoe Decker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users95,431 edits Closing debate, result was keep← Previous edit Revision as of 01:20, 17 December 2014 edit undoJoe Decker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users95,431 edits Undid revision 638424894 by Joe Decker (talk) good faith reopen to allow a comment that was said to be in progress when I closedNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. ]] 23:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Jayden Jaymes}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Jayden Jaymes}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 21: Line 15:
*'''Keep''' - win, so meets the requirements. <span class="unicode" style="white-space:nowrap;">]<span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;">]<br/><abbr class="abbr" title="intermediate level of English" {{#if:|lang="{{{3}}}"}}><small>(en-2)</small></abbr></span></span> 21:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - win, so meets the requirements. <span class="unicode" style="white-space:nowrap;">]<span style="display:inline-block; margin-bottom:-0.3em; vertical-align:-0.4em; line-height:1.2em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;">]<br/><abbr class="abbr" title="intermediate level of English" {{#if:|lang="{{{3}}}"}}><small>(en-2)</small></abbr></span></span> 21:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' This was originally closed as a clear '''Keep''' by myself, however, the NAC closure was contested as "too early". I've reverted myself and this AfD is again open for discussion. <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">]]</span> 22:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC) * '''Comment''' This was originally closed as a clear '''Keep''' by myself, however, the NAC closure was contested as "too early". I've reverted myself and this AfD is again open for discussion. <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">]]</span> 22:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 01:20, 17 December 2014

Jayden Jaymes

Jayden Jaymes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jayden Jaymes fails WP:Pornbio. Her AVN awards were in bogus categories. She has no mainstream popularity (appearing on MTV is not enough). She has no major contributions to pornography. Redban (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. She passes WP:PORNBIO because she has won a well-known and significant industry award; AVN's Best Body fan award in 2014, and she has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media; she has a lot more than just an MTV appearance. Winning two fan voted awards over a period of five years is evidence that she also passes WP:ENTERTAINER's criteria #2 which states "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following". Rebecca1990 (talk) 08:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure that Fan-Awards is enough; it simply shows that many people went online and clicked on her name. It's akin to citing google search totals. She also fails WP:GNG. The sources on her page are iafd, imdb, jaydenjaymesxxx, fameawards, AVN, XBiz, and Fameawards, all of which are not independent. The one reliable, secondary, independent source would be Jezebel.com, and this article focuses on Jayden's performance in MTV:True Life, not her pornography career. Redban (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment - All the current IMDB citations in this article here prove is that she was in a few, mostly minor, mainstream media appearances, although she was indeed featured in the MTV True Life TV episode that she was in. All of the citations to some of her apparent, past blog posts are currently dead, and the info that they supposedly cite doesn't really add any notability to her anyways. The real relevant standard for sources here is that they are independent of the subject of the article, which here is Jayden James, not the industry that a subject happens to appear mostly or partially in. Guy1890 (talk) 06:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep: As said by others: as she has won several AVN awards, she passes WP:PORNBIO. -- fdewaele, 11 December 2014, 19:00 CET
  • Keep per everyone above - passes WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG. –Davey2010(talk) 17:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - win, so meets the requirements. Subtropical-man talk
    (en-2) 21:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment This was originally closed as a clear Keep by myself, however, the NAC closure was contested as "too early". I've reverted myself and this AfD is again open for discussion. Dusti 22:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories: