Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Ronald Duncan (martial arts) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:25, 21 December 2014 editCrazyAces489 (talk | contribs)4,046 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:28, 21 December 2014 edit undoCrazyAces489 (talk | contribs)4,046 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
As per a suggestion by Thincat, I am recreating an article to put it on AFD so that it may be considered for main space . The previous article was deleted with one keep vote and two weak deletes. . A current version of the article for mainspace is available here or in the history of Ronald Duncan. ] (]) 13:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC) As per a suggestion by Thincat, I am recreating an article to put it on AFD so that it may be considered for main space . The previous article was deleted with one keep vote and two weak deletes. . A current version of the article for mainspace is available here or in the history of Ronald Duncan. ] (]) 13:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I can't really see the point of this exercise. The new article could simply be posted under the title, but I would advise revising it a bit first as it looks rather promotional in wording (yes, things can be promo even though the subject is deceased). I've not checked the references, and know very little about martial arts. The page under this title doesn't need a second debate here when there is nothing in the page to debate. The new draft is not eligible for debate here as this is Articles for Deletion, not Miscellany for Deletion. ] (]) 19:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC) *'''Comment''' I can't really see the point of this exercise. The new article could simply be posted under the title, but I would advise revising it a bit first as it looks rather promotional in wording (yes, things can be promo even though the subject is deceased). I've not checked the references, and know very little about martial arts. The page under this title doesn't need a second debate here when there is nothing in the page to debate. The new draft is not eligible for debate here as this is Articles for Deletion, not Miscellany for Deletion. ] (]) 19:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
*'''comment''' can someone undelete this article and talk page so that people can see the article to make an assessment. ] (]) 04:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:28, 21 December 2014

Ronald Duncan (martial arts)

AfDs for this article:
Ronald Duncan (martial arts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:CrazyAces489/Ron_Duncan


Recreated, deleted, needs second article debate as page was userfied, moved to mainspace and deleted CrazyAces489 (talk) 14:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

As per a suggestion by Thincat, I am recreating an article to put it on AFD so that it may be considered for main space . The previous article was deleted with one keep vote and two weak deletes. . A current version of the article for mainspace is available here or in the history of Ronald Duncan. CrazyAces489 (talk) 13:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment I can't really see the point of this exercise. The new article could simply be posted under the title, but I would advise revising it a bit first as it looks rather promotional in wording (yes, things can be promo even though the subject is deceased). I've not checked the references, and know very little about martial arts. The page under this title doesn't need a second debate here when there is nothing in the page to debate. The new draft is not eligible for debate here as this is Articles for Deletion, not Miscellany for Deletion. Peridon (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • comment can someone undelete this article and talk page so that people can see the article to make an assessment. CrazyAces489 (talk) 04:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories: