User:SPACKlick: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:40, 8 December 2014 editSPACKlick (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,193 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:42, 23 December 2014 edit undoSPACKlick (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,193 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 85:		Line 85:
	<br />		<br />
	<br />		<br />

			===Rachel Grana, PhD, MPH; Neal Benowitz, MD; Stanton A. Glantz, PhD===
			Why I don't buy it?
			Michael Siegel puts it
			Dr Farsalinos puts it
			He also signed on to which while not about the publication was about the claims of Stanton Glantz
			I enjoy Dr C V Phillips take on many things, including of the "''review''"

Revision as of 12:42, 23 December 2014

Note to self; Go here once in a while to review pending changes. About 0 Edits Need Reviewing!

This page was last edited or modified by SPACKlick (talk).

Useful links

Administrator Intervention against Vandalism	Admin Noticeboard, Incidents	New Pages Patrol	Requests for Page Protection	Requests for Permissions	Articles for Deletion	Deletion Process
Candidates for Speedy Deletion	Criteria for Speedy Deletion	Requested Moves	Request for Admin Attention	Dispute Resolution	Template Messages	Template User Messages
Sockpuppet Investigations	List of Policies	Admin Backlog	BarnStars	Reference Desk	Non Free Content	Image Use Policy

Template stolen from K6ka, who stole it from Bluefist, who stole it from Chzz, who stole it from Jennavecia. Yes, I'm a filthy no-good very bad thief.

Tags

Admin

This user is not a Misplaced Pages administrator but would like to be one someday.

Recent Changes

This user is a recent changes patroller.

Rachel Grana, PhD, MPH; Neal Benowitz, MD; Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Why I don't buy it? Michael Siegel puts it well Dr Farsalinos puts it strongly He also signed on to this letter which while not about the publication was about the claims of Stanton Glantz I enjoy Dr C V Phillips take on many things, including this blistering of the "review"

Categories: