Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:SiameseTurtle: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:22, 25 December 2014 editNickOrnstein (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users20,678 edits →User:SiameseTurtle ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:24, 25 December 2014 edit undoNickOrnstein (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users20,678 edits →User:SiameseTurtle Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*'''Totally, COMPLETELY KEEP ALL''' - As per SiameseTurtle; all of his defending statements apply to Misplaced Pages's 'Founding Fathers' Guidelines', such as "] states that they can be used for "organizing and aiding the work users do on Misplaced Pages"". The lists I have on my page are in relation to ] and the rules state that as long as information on my page relates to articles on this website than it is permitted. ] (]) 01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)		*'''Totally, COMPLETELY KEEP ALL''' - As per SiameseTurtle; all of his defending statements apply to Misplaced Pages's 'Founding Fathers' Guidelines', such as "] states that they can be used for "organizing and aiding the work users do on Misplaced Pages"". The lists I have on my page are in relation to ] and the rules state that as long as information on my page relates to articles on this website than it is permitted. ] (]) 01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
	*'''Delete'''. ]. If editors want to make up their own lists, they can do it somewhere else. If they want to work on names for the articles, they should be directed to ] or wherever else the project for this is doing it. There needs to be a central location for all this. There is zero purpose to have user versions of lists other than to create their own forks of the material. -- ] (]) 05:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)		*'''Delete'''. ]. If editors want to make up their own lists, they can do it somewhere else. If they want to work on names for the articles, they should be directed to ] or wherever else the project for this is doing it. There needs to be a central location for all this. There is zero purpose to have user versions of lists other than to create their own forks of the material. -- ] (]) 05:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
	*'''Comment''' I pity all of you wanting to remove necessary information from a USER PAGE and trying to act like police officers over a website. I will pray for all of you and God help you all and spend some Christmas Time with your family. ] (]) 02:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)		*'''Comment''' I pity all of you wanting to remove necessary information from a USER PAGE and trying to act like police officers over a website. I will pray for all of you and God help you all and spend some Christmas Time with your family and away from your computer...if you have a life and/or family. ] (]) 02:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 25 December 2014

User:SiameseTurtle

More WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns with these "oldest people" lists in userspace, similar to Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein and Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000. Ca2james (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete all - The main userpage has tables that are all useless without reliable sources. If sources are found, it can be added to List of British supercentenarians. The other three are also available elsewhere. Twins = List of oldest twins. Oldest = Oldest people and British supercentenarians = List of British supercentenarians. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Exactly. It just goes to show how useful these userspace lists have been in developing many of the reliably sourced articles in Misplaced Pages today (you're welcome). These pages were used as a base to create several articles, and many of the other userspace articles are pages that are being developed. As for the lack of reliable sources, well there are many reliable sources that can be cited. Unfortunately, it seems that many editors are not interested in constructively improving articles by adding sources - but rather interested in destructive editing by mass deletion. Here are your many reliable sources, which could have been added, even by yourself: . There is no particular need for these sections of my page anymore, but the destructive attitude against a multitude of editors who have contributed to dozens of articles is against WP:POINT - "Do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point". SiameseTurtle (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Totally, COMPLETELY KEEP ALL - As per SiameseTurtle; all of his defending statements apply to Misplaced Pages's 'Founding Fathers' Guidelines', such as "WP:USER states that they can be used for "organizing and aiding the work users do on Misplaced Pages"". The lists I have on my page are in relation to Oldest people and the rules state that as long as information on my page relates to articles on this website than it is permitted. Nick Ornstein (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete. WP:WEBHOST. If editors want to make up their own lists, they can do it somewhere else. If they want to work on names for the articles, they should be directed to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians or wherever else the project for this is doing it. There needs to be a central location for all this. There is zero purpose to have user versions of lists other than to create their own forks of the material. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment I pity all of you wanting to remove necessary information from a USER PAGE and trying to act like police officers over a website. I will pray for all of you and God help you all and spend some Christmas Time with your family and away from your computer...if you have a life and/or family. Nick Ornstein (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)