Revision as of 22:07, 15 July 2006 editTrödel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,484 edits Research← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:09, 15 July 2006 edit undoTheresa knott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,922 edits →NOTE: FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES OF []Next edit → | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I see you've already blocked ]. However, you might not have noticed the worst of what he's done. He fraudulently altered ]'s words from a delete vote to a keep vote, and deleted ]'s vote. Would this justify a longer block in your opinion? As far as I can tell, ] is a vandalism / POV push account only. ] 22:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | I see you've already blocked ]. However, you might not have noticed the worst of what he's done. He fraudulently altered ]'s words from a delete vote to a keep vote, and deleted ]'s vote. Would this justify a longer block in your opinion? As far as I can tell, ] is a vandalism / POV push account only. ] 22:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Well I tend to keeps blocks short in the first instance. If he comes back after a first block and disrupts again I'd be happy to indefinately block, but I'm hoping that 24 hours will be enough to teach him to bahave.] | ] 22:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Research == | == Research == |
Revision as of 22:09, 15 July 2006
archive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgment, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in any way, that's fine. I'm a big girl who can take it. If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better.
Please don't delete discussion
I believe that's considered bad form here on Misplaced Pages. Especially when it's appropriate discussion like discussion of criticism of Misplaced Pages on the Talk:Criticism of Misplaced Pages page. Thanks in advance. -Advocron 16:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Personal attacks and trolling are not discussion. As I alread explained to you that page is for discussion of the article not for you tp personoally rant and rave. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
"Welcome!"
Sorry, I knew you'd been here a while, the welcome notice was an accidental VandalProof click. I was trying to revert the vandalism to your page (notice my facetious "I'm a genius" edit comment when I finally did). Thanks for the help in dealing with the vandal. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks and important note
Thank you for deleting YaR GnitS's personal attacks against me on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gay ICP. I personally don't mind when people attack me... they usually only make themselves look bad. But it's nice to see another editor taking action to keep things civil. :) Kasreyn 21:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
NOTE: FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES OF User:YaR_GnitS
I see you've already blocked User:YaR_GnitS. However, you might not have noticed the worst of what he's done. He fraudulently altered User:Koosh's words from a delete vote to a keep vote, and deleted User:Rosicrucian's vote. Diff Would this justify a longer block in your opinion? As far as I can tell, User:YaR_GnitS is a vandalism / POV push account only. Kasreyn 22:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Well I tend to keeps blocks short in the first instance. If he comes back after a first block and disrupts again I'd be happy to indefinately block, but I'm hoping that 24 hours will be enough to teach him to bahave.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 22:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Research
Can you look at the history for deleted imagesImage:D hed shot.jpg & Image:Jobs Gates Mossberg 2005.jpg - if these were uploaded by User:Wmossberg they most likely were uploaded without understanding the license criteria. This user is Walter Mossberg and I will follow up with him to get permission to use these again. Also the history at Walt Mossberg should probably be merged with Walter Mossberg thx in adv --Trödel 22:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)