Revision as of 02:25, 20 June 2006 editJabberWok (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,473 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 07:15, 16 July 2006 edit undoEvanconway (talk | contribs)3 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
**Sentences that need them - Find sentences that are debatable, controverial, or something a proponent of ] would argue with and list them as "citation needed". Then follow the previous instruction right above. |
|
**Sentences that need them - Find sentences that are debatable, controverial, or something a proponent of ] would argue with and list them as "citation needed". Then follow the previous instruction right above. |
|
*'''Add to "Facts and Statistics"''' - needs to be fact-checked and more information about organics in other countries should be added |
|
*'''Add to "Facts and Statistics"''' - needs to be fact-checked and more information about organics in other countries should be added |
|
|
*'''Incompetent Writing''' The author fails to define the central concepts of the article. To start, lose "in general"(P1) and state the qualities shared by ALL organic food. Only then will the central organic/conventional comparisons carry any weight at all. |