Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Thank you and happy new year. I see the talk page of acupuncture still debate whether NCCAM is reliable. However, I see the discussion in Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine is closed . It seems the result is the source NCCAM can be considered as reliable sources. Hence, I wonder why acupuncture talk page still go on the debate. Did I miss something?
Thank you and happy new year. I see the talk page of acupuncture still debate whether NCCAM is reliable. However, I see the discussion in Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine is closed . It seems the result is the source NCCAM can be considered as reliable sources. Hence, I wonder why acupuncture talk page still go on the debate. Did I miss something?
Hello, I'm LesVegas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
Nice! I haven't seen that yet, so thank you for showing me. That's something I totally would be interested in! Thank you!! LesVegas (talk) 00:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you and happy new year. I see the talk page of acupuncture still debate whether NCCAM is reliable. However, I see the discussion in Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine is closed . It seems the result is the source NCCAM can be considered as reliable sources. Hence, I wonder why acupuncture talk page still go on the debate. Did I miss something?
Thank you.19:50, 4 January 2015Miracle dream (talk)