Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:*''Carter v. Carter Coal Company'' being titled as '']''
:*''Carter v. Carter Coal Company'' being titled as '']''
*] cases may be titled according to '']'' format or the format for the jurisdiction from which the case originated.
==Article content==
==Article content==
Revision as of 04:26, 7 January 2015
This guideline is a part of the English Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.
Use the {{law-stub}} template for law related stubs
Navigation templates
{{Template:ContractLaw}}
{{Template:TortLaw}}
{{Template:PropertyLaw}}
{{Template:CrimLaw}}
{{Template:EvidenceLaw}}
General considerations
In articles that cover multiple jurisdictions, aim to provide an international overview. Keep in mind that there are several types of legal system (e.g., civil law, sharia law, common law, customary law). Within a given legal system, the law may have evolved in divergent ways. Because the law differs between jurisdictions, make clear what jurisdiction you are writing about. Try to incorporate a comparative perspective, if possible and appropriate.
Articles about broad areas of law, such as Tort, should contain an overview of the law as it stands, and its development.
Avoid becoming overly technical.
Writing about particular cases
Start with a summary why the case is encyclopedic. What is its impact on society, what makes it stand out from all the other cases heard this year?
Summary in fairly plain language, for a lay audience, possibly followed by a more detailed introduction. For those who do not read the whole decision, this is sufficient for a start.
The legal details, for those who need to better understand the legal issues involved and how the court arrived at its decision.
Writing about particular concepts
Provide a framework for the concept. E.g. – Contextualise trespass as a tort.
In article text (for citations, see below), the first mention of a case should normally be formatted as A v. B. Cases from some jurisdictions, particularly those within the United Kingdom, use A v B. When referred to a second or third time within a section, cases may be referred to as A, or, if A does not disambiguate (e.g. Rex), B.
Citations and referencing
Cite to legal materials (constitutions, statutes, legislative history, administrative regulations, and cases) according to the generally accepted citation style for the relevant jurisdictions. If multiple citation styles are acceptable in a given jurisdiction, any may be used, but be consistent, and consider using the most common. Also consider using the citation style used in secondary sources rather than the citation style used by legal briefs or decisions.
The following guidelines will be generally useful in many jurisdictions:
In general
Where both primary and secondary sources are available, one should cite both. While primary sources are more "accurate", secondary sources provide more context and are easier on the layperson. Where primary and secondary sources conflict factually, the primary source should be given priority.