| Revision as of 10:05, 5 January 2015 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits →Homeopathy: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:24, 8 January 2015 edit undoMiddle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,216 edits ns: Discretionary sanctions notification (just a formality)Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| Hi, i am interested in introduce aspects about the history of the homeopathy, for example, you can see in ], there are the history of the acupunture. Regards. --] (]) 07:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | Hi, i am interested in introduce aspects about the history of the homeopathy, for example, you can see in ], there are the history of the acupunture. Regards. --] (]) 07:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : We have more than enough detail on the period before homeopathy was understood to be nonsense. Additional data points for the breadth of the delusion are not needed. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | : We have more than enough detail on the period before homeopathy was understood to be nonsense. Additional data points for the breadth of the delusion are not needed. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ==Discretionary sanctions notification== | |||
| Just a formality and because it is (AFAIK) a necessity for enforcement of sanctions; I know you know about this: | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ] and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| --] <small>(] • ])</small> 13:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:24, 8 January 2015
| Note to admins reviewing any of my admin actions (expand to read). |
|---|
|
I am often busy in that "real life" of which you may have read. Blocks are the most serious things we can do: they prevent users from interacting with Misplaced Pages. Block reviews are urgent. Unless I say otherwise in the block message on the user's talk page, I am happy for any uninvolved admin to unblock a user I have blocked, provided that there is good evidence that the problem that caused the block will not be repeated. All I ask is that you leave a courtesy note here and/or on WP:ANI, and that you are open to re-blocking if I believe the problem is not resolved - in other words, you can undo the block, but if I strongly feel that the issue is still live, you re-block and we take it to the admin boards. The same applies in spades to blocks with talk page access revoked. You are free to restore talk page access of a user for whom I have revoked it, unless it's been imposed or restored following debate on the admin boards. User:DGG also has my permission to undelete or unprotect any article I have deleted and/or salted, with the same request to leave a courtesy note, and I'll rarely complain if any uninvolved admin does this either, but there's usually much less urgency about an undeletion so I would prefer to discuss it first - or ask DGG, two heads are always better than one. I may well add others in time, DGG is just one person with whom I frequently interact whose judgment I trust implicitly. Any WP:BLP issue which requires you to undo an admin action of mine, go right ahead, but please post it immediately on WP:AN or WP:ANI for review. The usual definition of uninvolved applies: you're not currently in an argument with me, you're not part of the original dispute or an editor of the affected article... you know. Apply WP:CLUE. Guy (Help!) 20:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
- In science, any compromise between a correct statement and a wrong statement is a wrong statement. Thanks, user:Stephan Schulz.
- My activity level is 53mKo (milli-Koavfs).
- Sad now. Special:Contributions/Geogre.
- My Last.fm profile
- vGuyUK on Twitter | SceptiGuy on Twitter
- Obligatory disclaimer
- I work for Dell Computer but nothing I say or do here is said or done on behalf of Dell. You knew that, right?
Fine-tuned Universe
Hello Guy, thank you for your action on the above article stopping the edit war initiated by Tfd998. The same deletions have now been made under a unregistered IP 24.114.68.254, again without explanation. This could well be a sock of the banned "editor". I have no intention of keep reverting, thereby causing an edit war, but wonder if the article should be protected for a period? Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Dear oh dear. That's an indef and semi-protection then. Guy (Help!) 17:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your help. Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Homeopathy
Hi, i am interested in introduce aspects about the history of the homeopathy, for example, you can see in acupuncture, there are the history of the acupunture. Regards. --Pediainsight (talk) 07:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- We have more than enough detail on the period before homeopathy was understood to be nonsense. Additional data points for the breadth of the delusion are not needed. Guy (Help!) 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
Just a formality and because it is (AFAIK) a necessity for enforcement of sanctions; I know you know about this:
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.--Middle 8 (contribs • COI) 13:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Category: