| Revision as of 22:55, 12 July 2006 editRFerreira (talk | contribs)Rollbackers6,511 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:52, 17 July 2006 edit undoRenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs)24,239 edits close discussion: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ] ] 00:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters ] 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters ] 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. ] 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. ] 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 00:52, 17 July 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda 00:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Jackie Crockett
nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters Burgwerworldz 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - being related to a notable does not automatically make a person notable. - Che Nuevara: 22:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Smerge to the relatives, usual story. Stifle (talk) 14:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--Nick Y. 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to WP:BIO. Yanksox 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. RFerreira 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.