Revision as of 09:12, 5 January 2015 view sourceIZAK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,880 editsm →My apologies← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:15, 11 January 2015 view source Davidbena (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users56,534 edits →Go to article "Bayt Nattif" at the Talk Page there: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
:Izak, the problem has already been fixed. ] (]) 20:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | :Izak, the problem has already been fixed. ] (]) 20:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|Davidbena}} OK! ] (]) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Davidbena}} OK! ] (]) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Go to article "Bayt Nattif" at the Talk Page there == | |||
], can you please go to ]'s Talk page, at the last section there, there is a debate between me and another editor concerning the Arab-Israeli conflict. Looking for your advice. ] (]) 23:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:15, 11 January 2015
Note: If you post a message on this page, I will usually respond to it on this page.- 12 years on Misplaced Pages!
During December 2014, I celebrated the completion of twelve years on Misplaced Pages. Once again, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank the entire Misplaced Pages team and family and my many fellow editors for giving me the opportunity to use my time productively by allowing me to contribute from my education, knowledge, experience and skills to this amazing project over twelve very productive years. Thank you so much to everyone concerned and a special thank you to the many readers who utilize this encyclopedia. Feel free to leave a message at: User:IZAK/awards#And many more.
This user archives talk pages when they become too large. |
Archived talk:: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 30; 31: 32; 33; 34; 35; 36; 37; 38; 39; 40; 41; 42; 43; 44; 45; 46; 47; 48;
Dropping in and saying hi
I like the photo on your user page. lol. Very nice. Just to smile at you for being nice to everybody, I noticed. Regeane Silverwolf 03:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Regeane Silverwolf has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
- Dear Regeane Silverwolf: Thank you so much for the smile, it is greatly appreciated! IZAK 06:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Say, "Smile"!
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Trampton 16:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Trampton, thank you, IZAK 19:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello IZAK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Yosef Mendelevitch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Meshulam Dovid Soloveitchik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Avrohom Yehoshua Soloveitchik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Haym Soloveitchik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Elisheva Carlebach Jofen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Shlomo Carlebach (rabbi) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Yonasan David - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Richard Gordon (AJC) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Added refs to Yonasan David. Will work on the others. Some of these articles go back quite a few years! IZAK (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Added refs to Yosef Mendelevitch. IZAK (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD
Please don't let yourself get baited into these sort of arguments. DGG ( talk ) 16:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shabbos App may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- to one opinion of Rabbi ] (1878-1953) known as the '']'') one is building and breaking a circuit and in violation of the prohibition of [[Activities
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed. IZAK (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shabbos App, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yom Tov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- It was fixed. IZAK (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 30, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, S Philbrick(Talk) 01:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Shabbos App for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabbos App is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shabbos App (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa (talk • contribs)
- Thank you for informing me. IZAK (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Category:Talmud concepts and terminology
Category:Talmud concepts and terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for informing me. IZAK (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Meir Zlotowitz and ArtScroll
Hi, is there any way you can help here with an editor who insists on adding extraneous and libelous information to these articles? See . Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 15:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Thank you for contacting me. I took a look, and while it is legitimate to add a "Criticism" section to an article, it is not acceptable to drag extraneous issues into a biography of a living person, a clear violation of ignoring the rules of WP:LIBEL & WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND that is obviously meant to smear and drag and damage that person by exaggerating and distorting things that are not even backed up by WP:V & WP:RS. Therefore please see Meir Zlotowitz#Controversy and my edit summary "Create ==Controversy==, remove stuff that has nothing to do with him but belongs in an a Weiss-Dodelson affair article, Zlotowitz was tangentially involved. Add controversy to Lakewood Yeshiva & Malkiel Kotler as Dodelson supporters to be even" . Thank you and keep me posted, IZAK (talk) 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, IZAK. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Srully Abe Stein.Message added 14:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
NorthAmerica 14:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Northamerica1000: Thank you for letting me know. I have made the correction. Thanks again, IZAK (talk) 16:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Bye!
Thanks for your past help. I won't be contributing to Misplaced Pages again, but if there are other ways I can be of use to you, feel free to let me know. MarkBernstein (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- @MarkBernstein: Thanks and thank you for contacting me I am honored and you should feel honored too for acting and being an honorable person and contributor. I have also responded on your talk page as well . Best wishes and likewise, please feel free to stay in touch with me. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of Jewish communities by country
- added a link pointing to Kehilla
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- The links need to stay because they convey the needed message accurately. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 09:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
I apologize for reverting you
I apologize. You deleted the reference to the category "History of Israel" (which looked suspicious) and replaced it with a word which reminded me "liar" (with a spelling mistake), so I understood it as a vandalism. Actually, I know the אייר month name in Hebrew only , and did not realized that "lyar" is the English name. I am very sorry. Please forgive me. Ykantor (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ykantor: Thank you for your response. You are wrong again because I did not "delete" anything! All I did was alphabetize the categories and add one more (take a careful look again and you will see it for yourself!) You should have checked that more carefully before jumping to conclusions. Accusing an experienced editor of "vandalism" (when I have been actively editing WP for 12 years!) is a very serious allegation that should not be thrown about. We are free to disagree but not throw false charges in the heat of the moment. I have more to say, but for now we can leave it at that. Feel free to contact me at any time if I can be of help to you. Judging by other comments on your talk page you seem to be taking a lot of heat from a number of directions. I would therefore say, take a very deep breath, cool it,step back, maybe go on a WP:WIKIBREAK and never act impulsively or "shoot from the hip" because that style of reaction as we all go about building an encyclopedia will only paint you into a tight corner you do not wish to be in and do not deserve because you have a passion to help and should channel that in positive ways. All the best and be well, IZAK (talk) 10:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- -Oops, this is embarrassing. I apologize again, this time for the "History of Israel" issue. Sorry.
- -Thank you for your wishes and kind advice. I will appreciate it if you read this talkpage section and tell me your opinion on both my content and whether I follow Wiki rules. I am sure that I am right but who knows? I might be wrong in some aspects, and it would be better to be aware of such mistakes.
- -The issue is the cause to the Six-Day War. The article excludes the causes, and I want the causes to be included. I have listed plenty of wp:rs, including Arab sources, who claims that Nasser steps (during the 3 weeks crisis up to the war) made the war inevitable. Other editors are opposing this claim. It might be interesting for you to see the Israeli and Arab views concerning this war. Thanks. Happy Hanukkah. Ykantor (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ykantor: Thank you for your kind feedback. In the kind of situations you are mentioning, where there are obviously conflicting ways of looking at a conflict/wars (naturally!), the only way to resolve it is by using the tried and tested way of WP formatting that would be worded as: "According to Israeli ABC historians/sources, the causes of the war were XYZ, while according to EFG Arab historians/sources the causes of the were 123, while according to other historians/sources it was a combination of XYZ+123" -- thus each side's point of view is stated as such, that should hopefully result in a WP:NPOV description and explanation of events. In such articles there can eventually be sections and even spin-off articles about the different views and approaches with the passage of time as research mounts. Obviously, "winners" and "losers" have different and contradictory perspectives of the same historical events. In Jewish History for example, Tisha B'Av is viewed by Jews as a great tragedy to be mourned for thousands of years, while for the Romans it was a great victory to be celebrated forever. WP does not choose sides, when there are conflicting points of view about still-simmering conflicts, everyone's opinion is considered and all sides get to air their views in as fair and objective manner as humanly possible. IZAK (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- @IZAK: Thank you very much. I agree with every word of yours. Will it be possible for you to write at this talkpage section too? Ykantor (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ykantor: Unless I am actively editing an article I usually do not get involved in the discussions on talk pages. In fact it is a general WP guideline not to abuse talk pages. That means that it is best to come up with WP:V & WP:RS that are solid enough and insert them into actual articles in the type of "framework" I outlined above. If after that the good sources are unjustifiably rejected then it is worthwhile trying to understand why they are being rejected or why they should be included, depending on the situation. It should be easy to prove that from the point of view of Israel's national security perspective the various steps that Nasser did such as removing UN buffer troops in the Sinai, banning Israeli ships from using the Suez Canal and finally blocking the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping in effect blockading Eilat, were all casus belli that any idiot could see were provocations that no self-respecting independent nation would tolerate. Of course there are fools that think that the Jews have no right to fight back in kind or that Israel should just let itself be allowed to be destroyed. While Israel itself out of its national right of self-defense chooses to defend its national interests and not ignore provocations and then takes the steps it feels to fight back against its enemies and inflict defeat upon them. As they say, the Arabs can afford to lose many wars but Israel cannot afford to lose even one war because the war that it will lose will be it's "last war" so to speak. Anyhow, good luck with your work and do not lose your cool. Stick to the WP rules of WP:NPOV that allows for all sides to have their perspectives stated and always rely on the best WP:V & WP:RS you can find! Stay in touch! IZAK (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your good wishes and spending the time needed for reading this talkpage. Unfortunately the other editors there are biased and unjustifiably reject the wp:balance rule. It is rather difficult to be the only objective regular editor there and to see that most of my contributions are deleted. Do you happen to know an objective editor who may be interested (infrequently?) in editing those articles? thanks again, Ykantor (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ykantor: Unless I am actively editing an article I usually do not get involved in the discussions on talk pages. In fact it is a general WP guideline not to abuse talk pages. That means that it is best to come up with WP:V & WP:RS that are solid enough and insert them into actual articles in the type of "framework" I outlined above. If after that the good sources are unjustifiably rejected then it is worthwhile trying to understand why they are being rejected or why they should be included, depending on the situation. It should be easy to prove that from the point of view of Israel's national security perspective the various steps that Nasser did such as removing UN buffer troops in the Sinai, banning Israeli ships from using the Suez Canal and finally blocking the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping in effect blockading Eilat, were all casus belli that any idiot could see were provocations that no self-respecting independent nation would tolerate. Of course there are fools that think that the Jews have no right to fight back in kind or that Israel should just let itself be allowed to be destroyed. While Israel itself out of its national right of self-defense chooses to defend its national interests and not ignore provocations and then takes the steps it feels to fight back against its enemies and inflict defeat upon them. As they say, the Arabs can afford to lose many wars but Israel cannot afford to lose even one war because the war that it will lose will be it's "last war" so to speak. Anyhow, good luck with your work and do not lose your cool. Stick to the WP rules of WP:NPOV that allows for all sides to have their perspectives stated and always rely on the best WP:V & WP:RS you can find! Stay in touch! IZAK (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- @IZAK: Thank you very much. I agree with every word of yours. Will it be possible for you to write at this talkpage section too? Ykantor (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ykantor: Thank you for your kind feedback. In the kind of situations you are mentioning, where there are obviously conflicting ways of looking at a conflict/wars (naturally!), the only way to resolve it is by using the tried and tested way of WP formatting that would be worded as: "According to Israeli ABC historians/sources, the causes of the war were XYZ, while according to EFG Arab historians/sources the causes of the were 123, while according to other historians/sources it was a combination of XYZ+123" -- thus each side's point of view is stated as such, that should hopefully result in a WP:NPOV description and explanation of events. In such articles there can eventually be sections and even spin-off articles about the different views and approaches with the passage of time as research mounts. Obviously, "winners" and "losers" have different and contradictory perspectives of the same historical events. In Jewish History for example, Tisha B'Av is viewed by Jews as a great tragedy to be mourned for thousands of years, while for the Romans it was a great victory to be celebrated forever. WP does not choose sides, when there are conflicting points of view about still-simmering conflicts, everyone's opinion is considered and all sides get to air their views in as fair and objective manner as humanly possible. IZAK (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
@Ykantor: Try the following Users: Alansohn; Epeefleche; Davidbena; Brewcrewer; Galastel; Yoninah; Lisa as they are sensible editors often interested in this field, as well the following who are fair admins and have lots of experience in this area: Avraham; DGG; Jayjg. Keep me posted. Best wishes, IZAK (talk) 13:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Inverted pentacle.PNG
A tag has been placed on File:Inverted pentacle.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG: Hi there! You must be mistaken because I have NOTHING to do with this image and I cannot understand why you have contacted me. Regards, IZAK (talk) 13:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's an F2 Deletion, you may have added a tag or category on a local page? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG: Where? No clue and absolutely no memory of ever doing anything related to this image and its subject-matter ("satanism")! Can you trace how you got to me in this regard? Thanks, IZAK (talk) 14:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please accept my apologies, I can't find how your name came to be associated with this either. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG: No problem, and thank you for caring. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 06:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please accept my apologies, I can't find how your name came to be associated with this either. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG: Where? No clue and absolutely no memory of ever doing anything related to this image and its subject-matter ("satanism")! Can you trace how you got to me in this regard? Thanks, IZAK (talk) 14:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's an F2 Deletion, you may have added a tag or category on a local page? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JudeccaXIII (talk • contribs)
Question about edit on WP article
Izak, Shalom. Today, I made an edit on a WP article entitled Cyclamen persicum. I added the section entitled "Plant properties," now changed to "Uses." In it, I had written the sentence: "...The Bedouins of the land of Israel used to collect the root, and after grating it, would mix it with lime and sprinkle it over the surface of lakes or other large bodies of water known to contain fish," but another Wiki editor came along and changed the name "Israel" to "Palestine." I wanted to know if this is deemed proper procedure on Misplaced Pages, i.e., not to use the name "Israel" when referring to this country and to ignore, as it were, the political reality on the ground, or perhaps it is because the reference to the Bedouins there occurred during the British Mandate? Just curious. - Davidbena (talk) 19:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Davidbena: Thank you for contacting me with your important question. As far as I can tell anything that takes place within the internationally recognized borders of the state of Israel = Israel. I suggest you also ask this question of Users @Alansohn: & @Epeefleche: & @Yoninah: as to what they would do in this kind of situation, and ask for the input of the fair and experienced admins @Avraham: & @DGG: & @Jfdwolff: and please keep me posted. Best wishes, IZAK (talk) 07:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Izak, for this pertinent advice.Davidbena (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Davidbena: Thank you, no problem, travel safe on WP! IZAK (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would look for the best wp:reliable source on the subject. And see what it says. I can't see what the current ref says, as it is off-line. The edit summary used by the editor who changed your edit was non-sensical, btw, as the editor wrote: "geographic name," and of course the name he deleted was itself a geographic name. Epeefleche (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Davidbena: Thank you, no problem, travel safe on WP! IZAK (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Izak, for this pertinent advice.Davidbena (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
My apologies
I am sorry for accusing you of personal attacks and reporting you to ANI. It was never in my intent to fight or even argue with you. For that, I'm truly sorry. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- @JudeccaXIII: Thanks for contacting me. I assure you that I have no hard feelings, seems to me that you were just a bit over-exuberant and then over-reacted, as I see you are still "getting the feel" for how WP works, something that is quite complex as things stand. In all my 12+ years on WP I cannot recall jumping to go to ANI even under the toughest circumstances. My own philosophy when disagreeing with anyone is to hash it out on the talk pages and arrived at WP:CONSENSUS. Usually I find that those users who run to ANI are either very inexperienced or too rigid in their outlooks unable to engage in debates with others who do not share their worldview. Another thing, never underestimate the intelligence and capabilities of other editors. I always assume that I am dealing with very smart and educated people on WP with whom I can engage in WP:CIVIL debates on points of contention, and when that fails I find it alarming that some editors cannot take the heat and resort to running to ANI and all sorts of maneuvers in order to get their way rather than realize that WP is all about finding common ground with others who do not share your outlook or vision of things. Feel free to stay in touch and kindest regards, and happy 2015! May it be a year filled with blessings and peace on Earth! 06:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Help
Izak, I'm sorry to bother you, but I need help deleting some of the redundant "References" listed on the WP article Habban District. Davidbena (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Izak, the problem has already been fixed. Davidbena (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Davidbena: OK! IZAK (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Go to article "Bayt Nattif" at the Talk Page there
User:Izak, can you please go to Bayt Nattif's Talk page, at the last section there, there is a debate between me and another editor concerning the Arab-Israeli conflict. Looking for your advice. Davidbena (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)