Misplaced Pages

Talk:Celebrant (Australia): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:57, 13 January 2015 editJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits sociol / wp← Previous edit Revision as of 16:16, 13 January 2015 edit undoJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits ratingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP Australia|class=Start}} {{WP Australia|class=B}}
{{WP Sociology|class=Start|importance=low}} {{WP Sociology|class=B|importance=low}}


== No merge == == No merge ==

Revision as of 16:16, 13 January 2015

WikiProject iconAustralia B‑class
WikiProject iconCelebrant (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconSociology B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No merge

There is no reason at all to merge this with a larger entry that lists various common Euro-American wedding participants. If anything such an entry should link to this as the main entry.PelleSmith (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The Australian Civil Celebrant is genuinely unique and other Western Countries are still struggling to absorb the complex of concepts. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talk • contribs) 19:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

..and New Zealand

This term, celebrant is also used in New Zealand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxyporpoise (talk • contribs) 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC) -- I intend to put in a section in on New Zealand as soon as I can find a reliable source. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talk • contribs) 19:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Categories: