Revision as of 08:36, 14 January 2015 edit60.242.36.89 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:37, 14 January 2015 edit undo60.242.36.89 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{pagelinks|User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform}} | :{{pagelinks|User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform}} | ||
] for 6 years ] (]) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | ] for 6 years ] (]) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:what reasons has the page been nominated for deletion? Tulpa and Thoughtform are in reputable literature and that which is otherwise. If an article has citations it fulfills the criterion. If the entries are found in peer reviewed journals then they are encyclopedic. What is the contention except an ill informed value judgement as to their merit or otherwise? Ask a reputable reference librarian at a library/institution of merit if required to find reputable information. Refer agamic literature, tantric discourse, Transpersonal Psychology, etc. Blessings Beauford ] (]) 08:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | :what reasons has the page been nominated for deletion? Tulpa and Thoughtform are in reputable literature and that which is otherwise. If an article has citations it fulfills the criterion. If the entries are found in peer reviewed journals then they are encyclopedic. What is the contention except an ill informed value judgement as to their merit or otherwise? Ask a reputable reference librarian at a library/institution of merit if required to find reputable information. Refer agamic literature, tantric discourse, Transpersonal Psychology, etc. Blessings Beauford aka B9hummingbirdhovering ] (]) 08:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:37, 14 January 2015
User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform
WP:STALEDRAFT for 6 years Magioladitis (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- what reasons has the page been nominated for deletion? Tulpa and Thoughtform are in reputable literature and that which is otherwise. If an article has citations it fulfills the criterion. If the entries are found in peer reviewed journals then they are encyclopedic. What is the contention except an ill informed value judgement as to their merit or otherwise? Ask a reputable reference librarian at a library/institution of merit if required to find reputable information. Refer agamic literature, tantric discourse, Transpersonal Psychology, etc. Blessings Beauford aka B9hummingbirdhovering 60.242.36.89 (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)