Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
::And, for the record, the email indicates to me that Ferberson is User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte. Have a careful look at Ferberson's edits to the Child pornography article, such as , and decide if any or all of those edits should be reverted. My initial mindset in this case is a ]/] one, and WP:Deny should be clearer that it does not only apply to vandals. Ferberson is not an editor anyone should want editing child sexual abuse or child sexuality topics. His edits to sexual topics that don't involve children and teenagers are also often problematic. ] (]) 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
::And, for the record, the email indicates to me that Ferberson is User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte. Have a careful look at Ferberson's edits to the Child pornography article, such as , and decide if any or all of those edits should be reverted. My initial mindset in this case is a ]/] one, and WP:Deny should be clearer that it does not only apply to vandals. Ferberson is not an editor anyone should want editing child sexual abuse or child sexuality topics. His edits to sexual topics that don't involve children and teenagers are also often problematic. ] (]) 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Update: the Ferberson edit that I pointed to in my " 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)" comment above. ] (]) 03:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Revision as of 03:19, 21 January 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Child pornography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was deleted by an administrator and restarted as a stub on 22:07 2007-05-28, due to the presence of a problematic search term. The result of the deletion review was to refer further disputes to ArbCom. Revisions prior to the first that contained the term may be restored.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Just today, Jan. 7, 2014, the BBC ran another story discussing issues involving Japan and CP. There are a number of sections, but Artificially generated or simulated imagery in particular, where some inclusion of this information, in general, should be included. The "lolicon" issue, I would think, would be the apex example for inclusion. My formatting skills are quite atrocious so I'm hesitant to start making significant edits, even though I think they should certainly be made. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30698640 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxxx12345 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Organized crime
The organized crime section seemed pretty misleading about the significance of for-profit distribution of CP. That's been fixed a little bit, but there's still probably undue weight given to for-profit distribution. Ferberson (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
"Child sexual abuse images"
Does that terminology apply when the images are created by the child without any encouragement from, or involvement by, another person? Ferberson (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Note: I was told via email that Ferberson was globally banned over the weekend by WP:WMF; see here. A few other accounts, including User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte (a person that I recently helped catch), were also banned over the weekend by WP:WMF. During that time, I'd recently seen two of Nathan Larson's WP:Sockpuppet accounts pop on my WP:Watchlist because of WP:Administrators taking care of things at the user pages/talk pages of those accounts (see here and here), so I already knew something was going on regarding this matter. I received the aforementioned email about the WP:WMF bans yesterday, but saw it/read it for the first time several minutes ago. I was already suspicious of the Ferberson account for reasons that are obvious to me.Flyer22 (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
And, for the record, the email indicates to me that Ferberson is User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte. Have a careful look at Ferberson's edits to the Child pornography article, such as this edit, and decide if any or all of those edits should be reverted. My initial mindset in this case is a WP:Deny/WP:EVASION one, and WP:Deny should be clearer that it does not only apply to vandals. Ferberson is not an editor anyone should want editing child sexual abuse or child sexuality topics. His edits to sexual topics that don't involve children and teenagers are also often problematic. Flyer22 (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
