| Revision as of 12:49, 23 January 2015 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,410 edits →January 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:53, 23 January 2015 edit undo195.89.48.249 (talk) →January 2015: illiterate ramblings from a moronNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| == January 2015 == | == January 2015 == | ||
| Please stop edit warring on ]. There is a relatively recent consensus not to include an infobox, which is why there |
Please stop edit warring on ]. There is a relatively recent consensus not to include an infobox, which is why there isn't one present. Should you disagree with the change and wish to challenge the consensus, then you can open a thread on the talk page, or join in on the exiting thread. I strongly suggest you go down that route now without reverting once again. - ] (]) 12:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] (]) 12:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:53, 23 January 2015
July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Luis Posada Carriles has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Luis Posada Carriles was changed by 195.89.48.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926736 on 2014-07-18T17:17:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Please refrain from making test edits in Misplaced Pages pages, such as those you made to Bob Dylan , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
January 2015
Please stop edit warring on Stanley Holloway. There is a relatively recent consensus not to include an infobox, which is why there isn't one present. Should you disagree with the change and wish to challenge the consensus, then you can open a thread on the talk page, or join in on the exiting thread. I strongly suggest you go down that route now without reverting once again. - SchroCat (talk) 12:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)