Misplaced Pages

User talk:Notgonahappendude: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:38, 2 March 2010 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,596 edits no sockpuppetry← Previous edit Revision as of 21:10, 28 January 2015 edit undo99.224.51.134 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sock|GoldDragon}}

] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)



Revision as of 21:10, 28 January 2015

Multi-user iconAn editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of GoldDragon (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block logcontribslogsabuse logCentralAuth

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Kelvin Goertzen, you will be blocked from editing. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Specific case in point: this edit improperly relinked dates; dates should not be linked per the MOS. I do not see a need for blanket reversion, especially if the editor in question is not blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Category: