Misplaced Pages

User talk:GamerPro64: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 27 January 2015 editGamerPro64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,032 edits →Re: Misplaced Pages:Featured topic criteria/Retention: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 02:35, 29 January 2015 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits GamerGate Discretionary sanctions noticeTag: contentious topics alertNext edit →
Line 126: Line 126:
Hi, can I ask why you for ]? The album was released last October, so shouldn't the retention period already have passed? Or is it that we allow 6 months for albums?--<span style="background:white;color:">]]</span> 01:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC) Hi, can I ask why you for ]? The album was released last October, so shouldn't the retention period already have passed? Or is it that we allow 6 months for albums?--<span style="background:white;color:">]]</span> 01:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:I must have forgotten that the retention period was three months. I've done two this year already. Would you mind writing up the reassessment? ] 01:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC) :I must have forgotten that the retention period was three months. I've done two this year already. Would you mind writing up the reassessment? ] 01:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

==GamerGate Discretionary sanctions notice==
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:'''

The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed., a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
}} ] <small>]</small> 02:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

Revision as of 02:35, 29 January 2015

Welcome to my talk page. If you're planning on addressing me, call me Gamer.

Misc.

Also, keeping these for personal use: Misplaced Pages:Good topics/count, Misplaced Pages:Featured topics/count, Category:Unassessed Featured topics articles

Gamer's Cold Storage, changes to Video Games WikiProject, For the template


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16


This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present.

List of commercial failures in video gaming

So I was reading your WP:VG interview and decided to submit one of the articles you mentioned to reddit. It caused quite the traffic increase. JACOPLANE • 2011-04-7 21:17

Mega Man Powered Up

Here are some sources that may or may not be in the article right now. I'm on a Wikibreak so I won't be able to put them to prose.

  • - PSM Magazine, Play Magazine, Game Informer, Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine, PSM2 Magazine UK, games(™), Official PlayStation 2 Magazine UK

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

Caligula (film)

It's because I reviewed it and passed it, then someone else came along and took it down as if my review never happened, contributing unhelpful notes and then "failing" a nomination that I had already passed. If you have a problem with the issue I took with this unprofessional behavior, talk to the person who placed the exact same note on the GAN as I did. No, sorry, the review was not appropriate and I put it back up because it didn't get a proper review. If my passing of the article was not valid, neither is the "failing" from someone who made no attempt to actually improve the article. You should take issue with the fact that this is clearly a good article and should be listed as such, only the review passing it was wiped out by someone disagreeing with the good article criteria, which this article clearly fits. The lad searches the night for his newts (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: Misplaced Pages:Featured topic criteria/Retention

Hi, can I ask why you updated the retention period for .5: The Gray Chapter? The album was released last October, so shouldn't the retention period already have passed? Or is it that we allow 6 months for albums?--十八 01:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I must have forgotten that the retention period was three months. I've done two this year already. Would you mind writing up the reassessment? GamerPro64 01:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

GamerGate Discretionary sanctions notice

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed., a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Dreadstar ☥ 02:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33