| Revision as of 12:26, 18 July 2006 editUncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits Linked to prior discussion.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:52, 18 July 2006 edit undoAntares33712 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,663 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- ] 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- ] 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. ] | * '''Delete''' appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. ] | ||
| *'''Keep''' based on previous vote for keep, even if only for historical reasons ] 14:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:52, 18 July 2006
Psychotronics
- Psychotronics was nominated for deletion on 2004-12-31. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Psychotronics.
IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- Writtenonsand 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. Artw
- Keep based on previous vote for keep, even if only for historical reasons Antares33712 14:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)