| Revision as of 20:31, 27 January 2015 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 174.77.220.178 - ""← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:15, 29 January 2015 edit undo174.77.220.178 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ==Apologies== | ==Apologies== | ||
| My apologies regarding putting you in the line of fire predicated on |
My apologies regarding putting you in the line of fire predicated on a simple comment I made on your talk page. I had no idea such a 'tempest in teacup' would result. That being said, my wife's cousin is a clinical psychologist. I showed him the 'work product' of these editors, so to speak. He chose to show it to several of his colleagues. The jury came back with phrases and words describing the editors antics such as 'wholesale paranoia', 'obsessive', 'delusional', 'attention seeking', and 'fantasist' to name a few. And in common parlance, they deemed the marauding editors' resulting actions and punitive statements as unadulterated conjecture, utter nonsense, and paranoid theory gone unchecked, colored with hive/group think. I'd also like to point out that my comment on your talk page was my one and only contribution to it in it's entirety. So sorry again for inadvertently opening the proverbial door to the asylum, it was never my intention. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 29 January 2015
February 2014
Hello, I'm Toccata quarta. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Misplaced Pages experience! Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
plot summary
Plot summaries don't require citations, as the work itself is understood to be the source except when there certain intractable disagreements. --Ring Cinema (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Then why do they keep reverting my summary?Zabadu (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Diffs
Zabadu, I don't think you're too stupid for wiki; diffs can be very confusing before you get used to them. And it didn't much matter that you didn't provide the right kinds of diffs in your 3RR complaint, as the admin reviewing the complaint could quite easily see all that had happened (=Toccata quarta's reverts and your reverts) by looking at the history of the page. I don't think anybody minded about the diffs, although experienced users are expected to provide them.
Anyway. If you want to learn how to create diffs, in case you need them in the future, see the Simple diff and link guide. Bishonen | talk 01:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC).
January 2015
Your recent edits to WP:ANI could give Misplaced Pages contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that making such threats on Misplaced Pages is strictly prohibited under Misplaced Pages's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Misplaced Pages, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
==So what do I do? Everyone supports him, I'm just trying to report him. Zabadu (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC
Apologies
My apologies regarding putting you in the line of fire predicated on a simple comment I made on your talk page. I had no idea such a 'tempest in teacup' would result. That being said, my wife's cousin is a clinical psychologist. I showed him the 'work product' of these editors, so to speak. He chose to show it to several of his colleagues. The jury came back with phrases and words describing the editors antics such as 'wholesale paranoia', 'obsessive', 'delusional', 'attention seeking', and 'fantasist' to name a few. And in common parlance, they deemed the marauding editors' resulting actions and punitive statements as unadulterated conjecture, utter nonsense, and paranoid theory gone unchecked, colored with hive/group think. I'd also like to point out that my comment on your talk page was my one and only contribution to it in it's entirety. So sorry again for inadvertently opening the proverbial door to the asylum, it was never my intention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.77.220.178 (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)