Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:15, 30 January 2015

License tagging for File:Targeted Individuals indigo ribbon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Targeted Individuals indigo ribbon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons policy

Warning: if you continue to violate the Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons policy by adding unsourced negative information about living persons in the Targeted Individual article, I will report the matter - which will undoubtedly result in you being blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Targeted Individuals indigo ribbon.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Targeted Individuals indigo ribbon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Sjö (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page. OhNoitsJamie 17:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Do not modify comments from other users. If you do so again, your account will be blocked immediately. OhNoitsJamie 20:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Modifying comments by other editors

If you modify other editors' comments further, your block will be extended and your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie 21:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Repost of User:Clinicallytested/Targeted Individual

A tag has been placed on User:Clinicallytested/Targeted Individual requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

A word of advice

I suggest that you stop wasting people's time by repeatedly recreating the 'Targeted Indiviual' article - it is abundantly clear that this material will never be accepted as an article, and we don't have unlimited patience. If you wish to promote conspiracy theories, you will have to do so elsewhere. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Violations of site license

Note: You are recreating content that has an established attribution history. But using a copy/paste of that content, you are claiming all of the edits as your own. This is a violation of site license which states that all attributions must by in the article history, no matter how small.

To get restoration of the original attributions and the original text, please submit a request at WP:UNDELETE to have the material userfied. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• I wouldn't be copy/pasting if i could undelete, but unfortunately some admin deleted it. By the way, are you sure wikipedia gives you admins the right to delete user's sandboxes? It's crazy in a way. It's just a sandbox. So now i'm supposed to "submit a request at WP:UNDELETE to have the material userfied"? Ok.

A copy/paste that violates copyright and sites license can be deleted regardless of which userspace it resides. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• That sounds slightly crazy to me. Isn't it that all material published on wikipedia is free for all to modify and copy/paste? Anyway, the first part of the article comes from my editing.. Am i supposed to copy/paste only my part and ask the original editor to add his/her?

All material contributed to Misplaced Pages is released under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL license (which is stated and linked under the edit box anytime you edit a page). These licenses allow for re-use of the material, within certain key restrictions. Among these restrictions is included that the material must be attributed to the original contributor(s) of the material. This is part of the reason every article has a "history" tab. By viewing any page history, you can see the specific contributions by each editor. However, if you do a copy/paste, that history is gone, so that limitation of the site license is violated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: restoring the copy/paste in your user space would still be a violation. To be restored, you would need to request the article at Targeted Individual be undeleted by an admin (who can un-delete most things that have been deleted), and to then have that moved into your userspace.

However, there appear to be additional issues brought up at Misplaced Pages:Requests for undeletion which would prevent undeletion. To get that content and related history restored, you will need to discuss over there how you plan to resolve the concerns and to eventually improve the article into something that can meet Misplaced Pages content requirements. Afterall, Misplaced Pages is not a free web-host; just because it is your user-space, does not give you free-reign to create content that does not meet Misplaced Pages guidelines. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Electronic harassment

The existing consensus on the article talk page is clearly against the addition. Continued editing against community consensus can be viewed as vandalism and result in your account being blocked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• It doesn't look so.

If you are looking for an indefinite block, you are going about it the right way. Misplaced Pages is not a platform for the promotion of idiotic conspiracy theories, and it will not become so, no matter how many times you ignore policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

You disgust me

Seek psychiatric help. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Clinicallytested, you seem to engaging in an WP:EDITWAR with other editors. Can you please stop, and discuss this on the talk pages of the articles in question until there's a resolution on this, or I, or some other admin, will find it necessary to block you from editing. -- The Anome (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• There's no point in discussing with a wikipedia disgusting troll

Notice of edit warring

Your recent editing history at Electronic harassment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)