Revision as of 19:25, 31 January 2015 edit108.6.227.50 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:49, 31 January 2015 edit undo108.6.227.50 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:Actually, being part of a department is a good reason ''not'' to edit the information on the page. Anything you include need to be easily ] using independent, third-party sources. Please take the time to read ] and ] about making edits to articles on subjects you are affiliated with. Thanks. ] (]) 14:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | :Actually, being part of a department is a good reason ''not'' to edit the information on the page. Anything you include need to be easily ] using independent, third-party sources. Please take the time to read ] and ] about making edits to articles on subjects you are affiliated with. Thanks. ] (]) 14:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
My computer was giving me a hard time. I simply wanted to fix a grammar error. Thanks! |
Revision as of 19:49, 31 January 2015
Archives |
NYCFC
Shouldn't the team nick name come from the fans? Because that's how teams get their nick names — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only1bigc (talk • contribs) 18:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 26 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Robbie Rogers page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Liverpool FC
Hi Mosmof, Could i just inquire about the reasons as to why you constantly remove my contributions to the 'rivalries' section Liverpool FC page? You did say it was my POV but It's actually a factual account complete with (though incorrectly inserted) cited reference. The overall section on the rivalries is miss leading to the casual reader as it is, as there really should be a 'citation needed' insert at the end of the "rivalry intensified after Manchester Utd became the first English team to win a European cup" line. To say Liverpool's four European cup wins coincided with their domination of English football is a fact bore out by their Honours list in the same article aswell as my referenced add-on. I do think the overall section is miss leading to the casual reader without it.Richie bedfellows (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for leaving a message. My thinking is that "domination" is a little bit of a peacock term and the reader would be served better by simply stating the numbers (and looking at that passage again, I should probably edit the part about Manchester United "dominating" English football as well.
- FYI, this edit broke the formatting on the page - when you have a line break followed by a period, it messes up the rest of the line.
- Again, thanks - let me know if my latest edit works for you. Mosmof (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for the prompt response and the appropriate re-editing.Also apologies for the mix-up with the format. Just one more point, i do also feel the line mentioned about the rivalry intensifying in the 60's after Manchester Utd's European cup win is also a little dubious and slightly miss-leading to the casual reader. I do feel if this is the case then it either needs a citation or i could reference claims that the rivalry actually intensified in the 1970's after Liverpool started their successful period with their first of their eleven league titles in that period. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie bedfellows (talk • contribs) 18:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Coop City
Coop City is not a police force, just look at their own website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.236.207 (talk) 19:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- There's nothing indicating they're not a private police force. In fact, their badge features the words "N.Y. POLICE" and their Twitter handle is titled "Co-Op City Police" and its website features a logo with the word "community policing at its finest". So yeah, if we go by their own description, CC Public Safety is indeed a police force. Mosmof (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, being part of a department is a good reason not to edit the information on the page. Anything you include need to be easily verifiable using independent, third-party sources. Please take the time to read WP:COI and WP:BESTCOI about making edits to articles on subjects you are affiliated with. Thanks. Mosmof (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
My computer was giving me a hard time. I simply wanted to fix a grammar error. Thanks!