| Revision as of 20:14, 30 January 2015 editTracyMcClark (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,852 edits →January 2015: new section | Revision as of 20:50, 1 February 2015 edit undoSuperMarioMan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators60,737 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Giuliano Mignini. Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 -->] (]) 20:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 -->] (]) 20:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''']]]''' <small>( ''']''' )</small> 20:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 20:50, 1 February 2015
January 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Giuliano Mignini. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.TMCk (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Your recent editing history at Giuliano Mignini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 20:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.