| Revision as of 01:44, 21 January 2015 editIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 edits →January 2015: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:38, 2 February 2015 edit undoSTSC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,731 edits →Hong Kong: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. | Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. | ||
| Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Hong Kong == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:38, 2 February 2015
Anticomintern, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Anticomintern! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC) |
January 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to China does not have an edit summary. I provided a link in my edit summary that explains a problem with your edit. At this point, instead of reverting, you need to go to the article's talk page and try to find a consensus to include your edits.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hong Kong
Your recent editing history at Hong Kong shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. STSC (talk) 18:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)