Revision as of 22:04, 2 February 2015 edit24.79.36.94 (talk) →Illustration: br← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 2 February 2015 edit undo24.79.36.94 (talk) →Is this system really unusual?: both chartsNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I feel this may be quite a discovery ] (]) 01:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | I feel this may be quite a discovery ] (]) 01:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
*According to science paper, the most unusual thing about this system currently are the sizes of the planets. At the moment, systems most similar to this are ], ] and ]. --] (]) 20:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | *According to science paper, the most unusual thing about this system currently are the sizes of the planets. At the moment, systems most similar to this are ], ] and ]. --] (]) 20:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::You could add another planetary system chart underneath of our own system for comparison. I find the eccentricities to be interesting, and a comparison would be enlightening. Something like this: <br>{{OrbitboxPlanet begin | ::You could add another planetary system chart underneath of our own system for comparison. I find the eccentricities to be interesting, and a comparison would be enlightening. Something like this: <br> {{OrbitboxPlanet begin | ||
| table_ref = <ref name="EX-20150127" /> | |||
}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet | |||
| exoplanet = ] | |||
| mass_earth = | |||
| semimajor = 0.04178 | |||
| period = 3.60001053 | |||
| eccentricity = 0.16 | |||
| inclination = 88 | |||
| radius_earth = 0.4 | |||
}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet | |||
| exoplanet = ] | |||
| mass_earth = | |||
| semimajor = 0.04881 | |||
| period = 4.5458841 | |||
| eccentricity = 0.31 | |||
| inclination = 88.2 | |||
| radius_earth = 0.497 | |||
}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet | |||
| exoplanet = ] | |||
| mass_earth = | |||
| semimajor = 0.06 | |||
| period = 6.189392 | |||
| eccentricity = 0.18 | |||
| inclination = 88.16 | |||
| radius_earth = 0.53 | |||
}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet | |||
| exoplanet = ] | |||
| mass_earth = | |||
| semimajor = 0.0696 | |||
| period = 7.743493 | |||
| eccentricity = 0.1 | |||
| inclination = 89.13 | |||
| radius_earth = 0.546 | |||
}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet | |||
| exoplanet = ] | |||
| mass_earth = | |||
| semimajor = 0.0811 | |||
| period = 9.740486 | |||
| eccentricity = 0.29 | |||
| inclination = 87.96 | |||
| radius_earth = 0.741 | |||
}} | |||
{{Orbitbox end}} | |||
{{OrbitboxPlanet begin | |||
| "Solar System" | | "Solar System" | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 23: | Line 72: | ||
| exoplanet = ] | | exoplanet = ] | ||
| mass_earth = 0.055 | | mass_earth = 0.055 | ||
| semimajor = 0. |
| semimajor = 0.387 | ||
| period = 87.9691 | | period = 87.9691 | ||
| eccentricity = 0.205630 | | eccentricity = 0.205630 | ||
Line 32: | Line 81: | ||
| exoplanet = ] | | exoplanet = ] | ||
| mass_earth = 0.815 | | mass_earth = 0.815 | ||
| semimajor = 0. |
| semimajor = 0.723 | ||
| period = 224.701 | | period = 224.701 | ||
| eccentricity = 0.0067 | | eccentricity = 0.0067 | ||
Line 41: | Line 90: | ||
| exoplanet = ] | | exoplanet = ] | ||
| mass_earth = 1 | | mass_earth = 1 | ||
| semimajor = 1. |
| semimajor = 1.00 | ||
| period = 365.256 | | period = 365.256 | ||
| eccentricity = 0.01671022 | | eccentricity = 0.01671022 | ||
Line 50: | Line 99: | ||
| exoplanet = ] | | exoplanet = ] | ||
| mass_earth = 0.107 | | mass_earth = 0.107 | ||
| semimajor = 1. |
| semimajor = 1.524 | ||
| period = 686.971 | | period = 686.971 | ||
| eccentricity = 0.0935 | | eccentricity = 0.0935 |
Revision as of 22:06, 2 February 2015
Astronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Notes
Can someone add the age and mass off this star aswell as luminosity vs our sun to the data box --JSon94 (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Should note the Mike Wall Space.com ref is the primary source; whereas the Yahoo news ref source is a copy of the original Mike Wall ref - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wall, Mike (27 January 2015). "Found! 5 Ancient Alien Planets Nearly As Old As the Universe". Space.com. Retrieved 27 January 2015.
Distance
trying to find the distance to the star. Along with lumoinsity too. I have the other data added.JSon94 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
just need luminosity it's a KO orange dwarf JSon94 (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Is this system really unusual?
Both the compact planets and how close they orbit. How'd they manage to stay in such of compact system for 2x longer than our solar system? look how chaotic our solar system was. I feel this may be quite a discovery JSon94 (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- According to science paper, the most unusual thing about this system currently are the sizes of the planets. At the moment, systems most similar to this are Kepler-80, Kepler-32 and Kepler-33. --Artman40 (talk) 20:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- You could add another planetary system chart underneath of our own system for comparison. I find the eccentricities to be interesting, and a comparison would be enlightening. Something like this:
- You could add another planetary system chart underneath of our own system for comparison. I find the eccentricities to be interesting, and a comparison would be enlightening. Something like this:
Companion (in order from star) |
Mass | Semimajor axis (AU) |
Orbital period (days) |
Eccentricity | Inclination | Radius |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kepler-444b | — | 0.04178 | 3.60001053 | 0.16 | 88° | 0.4 R🜨 |
Kepler-444c | — | 0.04881 | 4.5458841 | 0.31 | 88.2° | 0.497 R🜨 |
Kepler-444d | — | 0.06 | 6.189392 | 0.18 | 88.16° | 0.53 R🜨 |
Kepler-444e | — | 0.0696 | 7.743493 | 0.1 | 89.13° | 0.546 R🜨 |
Kepler-444f | — | 0.0811 | 9.740486 | 0.29 | 87.96° | 0.741 R🜨 |
Companion (in order from star) |
Mass | Semimajor axis (AU) |
Orbital period (days) |
Eccentricity | Inclination | Radius |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mercury | 0.055 M🜨 | 0.387 | 87.9691 | 0.205630 | 7.005° | 0.3829 R🜨 |
Venus | 0.815 M🜨 | 0.723 | 224.701 | 0.0067 | 3.39458° | 0.9499 R🜨 |
Earth | 1 M🜨 | 1.00 | 365.256 | 0.01671022 | 7.155° | 1 R🜨 |
Mars | 0.107 M🜨 | 1.524 | 686.971 | 0.0935 | 5.65° | 0.533 R🜨 |
24.79.36.94 (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Illustration
Would it be useful to have a picture depicting the orbital configuration and sizes of planets? --Artman40 (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I think this system deserves an illustration just as much as any other that has one. 24.79.36.94 (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Binary star or not?
Discovery paper refers that this star has an M-dwarf companion. Does the paper tell if that's an optical double star or a gravitationally bound binary? --Artman40 (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
https://www.astro.up.pt/investigacao/conferencias/toe2014/files/tcampante.pdf
page 6
looks like it's a triple systemJSon94 (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cite error: The named reference
EX-20150127
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).