| Revision as of 02:29, 19 July 2006 editJohn254 (talk | contribs)42,562 edits converting references to Cite.php format and fixing formatting in criticisms section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:37, 19 July 2006 edit undoJohn254 (talk | contribs)42,562 edits adding citation to criticisms sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ==Criticisms== | ==Criticisms== | ||
| Some advocates of relational views of human sexuality claim that "sex-positivists" have invented "sex-negativity" as a ] argument against which they can assert "sex-positivity". |
Some advocates of relational views of human sexuality claim that "sex-positivists" have invented "sex-negativity" as a ] argument against which they can assert "sex-positivity".<ref>Morality in Media: "", Section 11</ref> In this view, human sexuality is regarded as an expression of love between two people. Thus, from this perspective, ], ], and other aspects of "sex-positivity" are regarded as degradations of human sexuality with a tendency to destroy romantic love and promote "soulless" physical ]. , a prominent advocacy organization in the ], articulates this viewpoint: | ||
| <blockquote>"The pornography business takes the beauty of real love and converts it into soulless, commercialized slime. The porn-fighters protect healthy sexuality with the key ingredients of love, tenderness, commitment, and the privacy of intimate moments." </blockquote> | <blockquote>"The pornography business takes the beauty of real love and converts it into soulless, commercialized slime. The porn-fighters protect healthy sexuality with the key ingredients of love, tenderness, commitment, and the privacy of intimate moments." </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 19 July 2006
The sex-positive movement is a loosely defined term that applies to a wide variety of elements that embrace social and philosophical attitudes promoting open sexuality with few (or no) limits.
The movement in general does not make moral distinctions between heterosexual or homosexual sex, or indeed masturbation for people who are otherwise celibate, regarding these choices as matters of personal preference. The sex-positive position also includes acceptance of BDSM and polyamory, as well as transsexuality, transgenderism, and other forms of gender transgression, in general.
Most elements of the sex-positive movement advocate sex education as part of its campaign. Safe sex, however, is a more contested issue.
One definition of sex-positivity, from (Queen, 1997):
Sex-positive, a term that's coming into cultural awareness, isn't a dippy love-child celebration of orgone – it's a simple yet radical affirmation that we each grow our own passions on a different medium, that instead of having two or three or even half a dozen sexual orientations, we should be thinking in terms of millions. "Sex-positive" respects each of our unique sexual profiles, even as we acknowledge that some of us have been damaged by a culture that tries to eradicate sexual difference and possibility.
Some advocates of sex-positivity define their philosophy in contrast to sex-negativity, which they identify as the dominant view of sex in Western culture. Under Western, Christian tradition, sex is seen as a destructive force except when it is redeemed by the saving grace of procreation, and sexual pleasure is seen as sinful. Sexual acts are ranked hierarchically, with marital heterosexuality at the top of the hierarchy and masturbation, homosexuality, transsexuality, and other sexualities that deviate from societal norms closer to the bottom. Medicine and psychiatry are said to have also contributed to sex-negativity, as they may, from time to time, designate some forms of sexuality that appear on the bottom of this hierarchy as being pathological (see Mental illness).
Criticisms
Some advocates of relational views of human sexuality claim that "sex-positivists" have invented "sex-negativity" as a Straw man argument against which they can assert "sex-positivity". In this view, human sexuality is regarded as an expression of love between two people. Thus, from this perspective, pornography, masturbation, and other aspects of "sex-positivity" are regarded as degradations of human sexuality with a tendency to destroy romantic love and promote "soulless" physical hedonism. Morality in Media, a prominent advocacy organization in the Anti-pornography movement, articulates this viewpoint:
"The pornography business takes the beauty of real love and converts it into soulless, commercialized slime. The porn-fighters protect healthy sexuality with the key ingredients of love, tenderness, commitment, and the privacy of intimate moments."
References
- Queen, Carol (1997). Real Live Nude Girl: Chronicles of Sex-Positive Culture. Pittsburgh (Cleis Press). ISBN 1-57344-073-6
- Rubin, Gayle (1984). Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Carole S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and Danger: exploring female sexuality, pp. 267–319. Boston (Routledge & Kegan Paul). ISBN 0-7100-0074-6
- Morality in Media: "When porn defenders challenge obscenity law enforcement, here's how to answer them", Section 11