Revision as of 21:20, 7 February 2015 editCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →New York v. Strauss-Kahn and later allegations: not remotely RS for use in a BLP here← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 7 February 2015 edit undo88.88.22.29 (talk) →New York v. Strauss-Kahn and later allegations: rNext edit → | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
The CounterPunch.org "article" unfortunately fails RS for use in any BLP on this planet, as it is utterly in conspiracy theory territory. Cheers. ] (]) 21:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | The CounterPunch.org "article" unfortunately fails RS for use in any BLP on this planet, as it is utterly in conspiracy theory territory. Cheers. ] (]) 21:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
: Cf. ref above to "Businessinsider.com" plus "The guardian". Cheers bakatcha. ] (]) 21:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:45, 7 February 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dominique Strauss-Kahn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A news item involving Dominique Strauss-Kahn was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 May 2011. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dominique Strauss-Kahn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
diplomatic immunity
Strauss-Kahn entitled to diplomatic immunity?
References
DSK PR article
This article is incredibly biased and presents a positive view of a man with incredible moral failings. Who wrote this article? His PR team? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.243.82.18 (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
This latest matter ought to be integrated: PatGallacher (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Family
Given that no one disputes a sexual encounter of some kind took place in the New York hotel (notwithstanding disagreements about consent), are his wife and daughters just fine with all this or what? The article needs to flesh the personal life section out slightly (a sentence or two would do fine) to resolve the question in the reader's mind of what the consequences of the encounter were for DSK. Credulity (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Our articles are based on published reliable sources - not speculation. If one discounts tabloid tittle-tattle (which we do), there doesn't appear to have been much published on the question, as far as I'm aware - not that it is really encyclopaedic material anyway. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Obviously I'm not asking for speculation. While I'm no fan of prurient tabloid stuff either, I do think this would be encyclopaedic, given the highly public nature of the whole affair. I mean, if it's considered relevant to mention the name of his wife and that he has four daughters at all, it must be relevant to mention any reaction they are known to have had to the event that has made DSK more famous around the world than anything else he has ever done. Credulity (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Can I suggest that you see if you can find suitable sources for this, and then we can discuss what, if anything, needs to be added to the article? Without actually seeing what such sources say, this discussion isn't going to get us far. 18:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- As far as I have observed none of his daughters or his now estranged wife have ever commented on the 'incident' in New York or what else was revealed about DSK's 'lifestyle'. His daughters may have children, so there's a big reason not to comment and attract attention to yourself that you are indeed the daughter of a man who has been ridiculed worldwide and despised in those quarters where (mostly women) people do not appreciate men thinking they are butterflies. His 'private' life cost him his job and his marriage, and wherever he now goes he'll be the one .... When people do not comment at all on something, I interpret that as they haven't got anything positive to say. His involvement in the elf Aquitaine/Leuna-Minol/Mitterrand/Kohl thing would actually be a lot more interesting than what his daughters think, not much to crow about I reckon. 144.136.192.32 (talk) 06:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- His wife strongly supported him, as noted in New_York_v._Strauss-Kahn#Support_and_opposition. I doubt there have been any other public pronouncements. That stuff about chess in the 'personal life' section strikes me as fairly naff, while the subsequent juxtaposition of his sex partying in the next sentence is quite comical. Courtesy his PR team I expect. Elissa Rubria Honoria (talk) 02:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Μεταφραση κειμένου
Σχόλιο. Η ελληνική Μεταφραση του αγγλικού κειμένου είναι επιεικώς ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΗ. Σχεδόν ακατανόητο όσα γράφονται. Υπάρχει τρόπος βελτίωσης;;;; Θα έπρεπε να εξετάστηκε! Ευχαριστω για την φιλοξενία . Gisele Gozlan Athens-Greece ggozlan@mausas.gr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.89.217 (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Now this is all Greek to me - shouldn't be here. Gisele, voulez-vous traduire en Anglais s.v.p.? 144.136.192.32 (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Comment. The Greek translation of the English text is mildly unacceptable. Almost incomprehensible what is written. Is there any way to improve???? Should be examined! Thanks for the hospitality." À votre service ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.24.138.1 (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
The Washington Consensus
DSK was abandoning the Washington Consensus/Kurswechsel (Stiglitz: It is a set of policies formulated between 15th and 19th streets by the IMF, U.S. Treasury, and World Bank. Countries should focus on stabilization, liberalization, privatization. It's based on a rejection of the state's activist role and the promotion of a minimalist, noninterventionist state. The analysis in the era of Reagan and Thatcher was that government was interfering with the efficiency of the economy through protectionism, government subsidies, and government ownership. Once the government "got out of the way," private markets would allocate resources efficiently and generate robust growth. Development would simply come. The Washington consensus also considers capital market liberalization essential, and the IMF took it as a central doctrine. The focus is on deregulation, not on finding the right regulatory structure.):
- http://www.smh.com.au/business/washington-consensus-is-over-says-imf-chief-20110405-1d2vg.html Washington consensus is over, says IMF chief, April 6, 2011
- http://www.querschuesse.de/hollande-strauss-kahn-der-washington-consensus-und-europa-vor-einem-kurswechsel, 27. Mai 2012
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBlmHzL-jJ4 Dominique Strauss-Kahn sex scandal REAL or FRAMED?!, 17 May 2011 --79.223.8.7 (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
New York v. Strauss-Kahn and later allegations
The fact of claims that DSK was exposed to a honey trap should be included, as it's relevant. 88.88.22.29 (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- No it is not relevant and Misplaced Pages does not routinely give a soapbox to fringe theories. There is a steady stream of this stuff. Mezigue (talk) 10:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Respectfully, the "steady stream of this stuff" as you call the honey-trap claims should be included as factual occurences in mainstream media http://www.businessinsider.com/dominique-strauss-kahn-liberation-interview-woman-raped-parking-lot-set-up-2011-5 http://www.theguardian.com/world/blog/2011/nov/28/dominique-strauss-kahn-conspiracy-theory --88.88.22.29 (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC).
The CounterPunch.org "article" unfortunately fails RS for use in any BLP on this planet, as it is utterly in conspiracy theory territory. Cheers. Collect (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cf. ref above to "Businessinsider.com" plus "The guardian". Cheers bakatcha. 88.88.22.29 (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class France articles
- Mid-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Start-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press