User talk:Anticomintern: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:46, 3 February 2015 editSTSC (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users8,731 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:16, 10 February 2015 edit undoAnticomintern (talk \| contribs)83 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.		Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
	Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)		Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

	== Hong Kong ==

	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

	'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

	== The ] article ==

	Please note that your edits must follow Misplaced Pages policies on ] and ], and do not insert any addition which is not from the source. ] (]) 18:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

	==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
	]
	Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 17:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:16, 10 February 2015

Anticomintern, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Anticomintern! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

January 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to China does not have an edit summary. I provided a link in my edit summary that explains a problem with your edit. At this point, instead of reverting, you need to go to the article's talk page and try to find a consensus to include your edits.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)