| Revision as of 15:16, 11 February 2015 edit3family6 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers26,942 edits →Edit warring: forgot to sign← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:05, 11 February 2015 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,576,866 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| == Edit warring == | == Edit warring == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| {{uw-3rr|Genghis Khan}}--] (] | <small>]</small>) 15:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--] (] | <small>]</small>) 15:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:05, 11 February 2015
Disruptive editing
I again urge you to review Misplaced Pages policies on editing. Please see WP:TPNO regarding unacceptable behavior in talk page discussions and WP:DE on disruptive behavior generally. Misplaced Pages is not a fight. It is a collaborative effort. If you have no intention of following Misplaced Pages guidelines or learning its policies, then please do not interrupt the good faith work of others. And blanking your talk page simply to remove admonitions of your poor behavior does not make them go away. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Genghis Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)