| Revision as of 18:31, 19 July 2006 editKarwynn (talk | contribs)1,120 edits Careful← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:04, 19 July 2006 edit undoWeevlos (talk | contribs)36 edits →CarefulNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Be careful that your new sub-page does not become a soapbox. If I were you, I'd eliminate much of the commentary and make it more of a list/database format or you'll get blocked just like the others. ] ] 18:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | Be careful that your new sub-page does not become a soapbox. If I were you, I'd eliminate much of the commentary and make it more of a list/database format or you'll get blocked just like the others. ] ] 18:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * I have contributed articles and edits in good faith to Misplaced Pages before and if I am blocked for civil criticism then it will merely cement the proof of abusive behavior by the people in question. --] 19:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:04, 19 July 2006
Dear Weevlos
Welcome to the Internet's fastest growing community of encyclopedia editors!
Just a note to help you in your editing: you marked an edit to the article Bantown as a minor edit. The help page on minor edits states:
"Reverts to a disputed page are unlikely to be minor. When a page is disputed, and especially if an edit war is brewing or in full eruption, then it's better not to mark ANY edit as minor, unless you're sure that all other users will agree it's minor, like correcting a misspelling."
You should usually only mark an edit as minor when it's a simple correction of spelling or an obvious typo, or a change in formatting which doesn't affect the content of a page.
hth.
Via strass 03:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Careful
Be careful that your new sub-page does not become a soapbox. If I were you, I'd eliminate much of the commentary and make it more of a list/database format or you'll get blocked just like the others. Karwynn (talk) 18:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have contributed articles and edits in good faith to Misplaced Pages before and if I am blocked for civil criticism then it will merely cement the proof of abusive behavior by the people in question. --Weevlos 19:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)