| Revision as of 09:11, 19 July 2006 editTalandor (talk | contribs)154 edits →Proposal for deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:59, 19 July 2006 edit undoSekelsenmat (talk | contribs)457 editsm →Proposal for deletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Chrome even has features that C# does not have, so it would not be even possible to create Chrome as a preprocessor. (Async methods, Meta Classes...) | Chrome even has features that C# does not have, so it would not be even possible to create Chrome as a preprocessor. (Async methods, Meta Classes...) | ||
| --] 11:04, 19 Jul 2006 | --] 11:04, 19 Jul 2006 | ||
| : This deletion request is non-sense. According to his argument we could just delete all commercial compilers from wikipedia. --] 19:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:59, 19 July 2006
Proposal for deletion
This is just a commercial version of a compiler for object pascal. Spankman 06:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- So is Delphi and it's not being deleted. I think you should RfD this instead of PROD. --Arny 07:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Worse, I think the "object pascal" moniker is more marketing than descent. It looks like C# or Java that has been run through a preprocessor to look like Pascal. One can change the tokens, (like {} -> begin..end), but that doesn't make it Pascal.
Chrome is NOT a preprocessor for C#. It is a native .net compiler that does compile Object Pascal. There are some changes to make the pascal more in line with the .net framework. (like NameSpace instead of Unit) Chrome even has features that C# does not have, so it would not be even possible to create Chrome as a preprocessor. (Async methods, Meta Classes...) --Talandor 11:04, 19 Jul 2006
- This deletion request is non-sense. According to his argument we could just delete all commercial compilers from wikipedia. --Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho 19:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)