Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:44, 17 February 2015

File:EStabPrn.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EStabPrn.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

GamerGate notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Acroterion (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about that

My mistake on the unsigned template, didn't mean to put it right in the middle of you comment. Thanks for fixing it. — Strongjam (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Not a problem! Apples grow on pines (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Personal attack

I do not appreciate your false assertion that I "sneakily: added anything to the closed discussion; I was attempting to correct the disruption caused by you and the other editors there. Please retract your false assertion immediately. Dreadstar ☥ 02:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Just to be clear. Personal attacks are disruptive and violate the GamerGate General sanctions mentioned in the section above. Dreadstar ☥ 02:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the assertion is not false. You closed a discussion, after which I posted a proposed edit, not having noticed that you closed the discussion. You will note that this happened to another editor, too, and you've treated us in very different ways. My edit was moved up to the "closed" discussion, as if it didn't deserve consideration, while the other was moved to a separate thread. You have done this without notifying me in any way, in a manner that could be described as stealthy, or, indeed, sneaky.

I apologise for the tone of my message, but I do believe that your behaviour was unacceptable, and would appreciate an apology in return. Apples grow on pines (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

To further clarify, from WP:NPA: Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki.

The evidence to be considered is the edit history of the page in question, which clearly outlines the order of events and your response to both suggestions: Apples grow on pines (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

To clarify even further, this "fix" is the offending edit. Would you not agree that calling a major edition like this something more specific than "fix" would have helped establish your good will? Apples grow on pines (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

There was nothing "sneaky" about it, I was very clear in my edits as an uninvolved administrator that I was "fixing" the additional discussion by placing it under the archive. Your edit to the archived section was inappropriate and disruptive.But no problem, I won't ask you again - I'll let it stand as is. Dreadstar ☥ 03:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay. I've edited my assertion to include direct evidence of your sneaky behaviour. That way everyone can make up their own mind about it. Of course, we also both know that you were directly involved moments before closing it, but, again, the edit history reflects that sufficiently. As neither of us seem to feel this warrants further action, I will consider this matter closed. Apples grow on pines (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm referring to 'involved' as in WP:INVOLVED; I was in process of moving legitimate discussion about sources and content to a new section - none of this was 'sneaky'. Please feel free to pursue this at WP:ANI if you believe I've acted inappropriately, otherwise I consider myself uninvolved and will continue acting in an administrative capacity on GamerGate related articles. Dreadstar ☥ 03:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

As I said, I feel this warrants no further action. Your behaviour has been pointed out to you, which will hopefully be enough. I'd appreciate it if we could part our ways now (outside of your administrative duties, of course), as it is clear we will not reach an agreement and this discussion does not stand a chance at becoming productive. Apples grow on pines (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

• I've hatted your inappropriate discussion of another editor's behavior, discussing other editors on article talk pages is inappropriate per WP:TPNO, WP:CIV and WP:NPA. Instead, WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE should be followed. Dreadstar ☥ 03:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay. I hope you got your kicks out of that. Can you leave me alone now, please? Apples grow on pines (talk) 03:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Alert of standard discretionary sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)