| Revision as of 15:12, 5 February 2015 editBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,714 edits Undid revision 644606444 by 99.224.51.134 (talk) -no need.to tag r year old accounts← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:42, 19 February 2015 edit undo64.134.240.11 (talk)No edit summary | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{sock|GoldDragon}} | |||
| ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:42, 19 February 2015
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of GoldDragon (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Kelvin Goertzen, you will be blocked from editing. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Specific case in point: this edit improperly relinked dates; dates should not be linked per the MOS. I do not see a need for blanket reversion, especially if the editor in question is not blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Do not circumvent your block by editing without logging in, as you appear to have done with 99.192.117.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). —C.Fred (talk) 01:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)