Revision as of 02:57, 26 February 2015 editDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,872 editsm Reverted edits by 129.7.105.251 (talk) to last version by SineBot← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:54, 27 February 2015 edit undo72.94.152.209 (talk) →Re: Abomination of Desolation: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 274: | Line 274: | ||
For catching the markup copyedit issue at Laboratory Condensers. Cheers. Le Prof <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | For catching the markup copyedit issue at Laboratory Condensers. Cheers. Le Prof <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== Re: Abomination of Desolation == | |||
I provided a reference which contains the reliable source. The 2nd King of Persia died from complications due to an automobile collision. His wife and mother stated concerning his incoherency, not me. When I got to him, he was breathing unconscious only out of one lung with heaving. The date is accurate and pans out to be in alignment with Feast Days in accord with other prophecy. | |||
This is the second time the "Current Reckoning" has been vandalized. Please undo your error in judgment and see to it that it doesn't happen again. |
Revision as of 02:54, 27 February 2015
New messages, questions, comments: Put at very bottom of page, see text of this section
Please put new messages at the very bottom of the page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 08:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC) To clarify, the new item should not be below this message and not below the repeated message after my introductory paragraphs but at the very bottom of the page after every other item on the page. It will help me to understand what you are talking about to add a section heading, identify the article you are concerned with (if your question or comment refers to a specific article), using a link, probably putting the article title in the heading, and sign your edit with four tildes (~~~~) so I know to whom to reply. Keep an eye on this page because I may just reply here if the answer is simple and does not seem to be time sensitive. When I notice an out of order question or comment, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is none already. Donner60 (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Archives |
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 |
Misplaced Pages policies, guidelines; twitter, facebook; what Misplaced Pages is not; avoiding common mistakes
References to Misplaced Pages policies, guidelines, instructions, include:
Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style. Misplaced Pages guidelines on twitter, facebook: Misplaced Pages:Twitter. Misplaced Pages guidelines, policies on external links: Misplaced Pages:External links. See Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not, which includes not a dictionary, a publisher of original thought, a soapbox or means of promotion, a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, a blog, Web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site, a directory, a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal, a crystal ball, a newspaper, or an indiscriminate collection of information. • Misplaced Pages:Verifiability. • Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. • Misplaced Pages:No original research. • Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons. • Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources. • Misplaced Pages:Citing sources. • Misplaced Pages:Notability. • Misplaced Pages:Image use policy. • Misplaced Pages:Avoiding common mistakes. • Misplaced Pages:Vandalism. • Misplaced Pages:Categorization#Articles. • Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles.
User Talk page guidelines
Excerpts Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Misplaced Pages is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia.
Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and unregistered users.
There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags. See Misplaced Pages:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings for full details.
User talk pages are subject to the general userpage guidelines on handling inappropriate content—see Misplaced Pages:User pages#Handling inappropriate content.
- Personal talk page cleanup: On your own user talk page, you may archive threads at your discretion. Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving.
From the section Editing comments, Other's comments in Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines:
- Fixing format errors that render material difficult to read. In this case, restrict the edits to formatting changes only and preserve the content as much as possible. Examples include fixing indentation levels, removing bullets from discussions that are not consensus polls or requests for comment (RfC), fixing list markup, using
<nowiki>
and other technical markup to fix code samples, and providing wikilinks if it helps in better navigation. - Fixing layout errors: This could include moving a new comment from the top of a page to the bottom, adding a header to a comment not having one, repairing accidental damage by one party to another's comments, correcting unclosed markup tags that mess up the entire page's formatting, accurately replacing HTML table code with a wikitable, etc.
- Sectioning: If a thread has developed new subjects, it may be desirable to split it into separate discussions with their own headings or subheadings. When a topic is split into two topics, rather than sub-sectioned, it is often useful for there to be a link from the new topic to the original and vice versa. A common way of doing this is noting the change at the end of the original thread, and adding an unobtrusive note under the new heading, e.g.,
:
. Some reformatting may be necessary to maintain the sense of the discussion to date and to preserve attribution. It is essential that splitting does not inadvertently alter the meaning of any comments. very long discussions may also be divided into sub-sections.<small>
This topic was split off from ], above.</small>
Note that it is proper to use <nowiki>
and other technical markup to fix code samples.
...............................
Please put messages, questions or comments at the very bottom of the page. If you put them here (immediately before or after this paragraph), as some people have done, I may either not see them or more likely not see them very promptly. That will delay any reply from me to you. To clarify, this should not be below this message but at the very bottom of the page after every other item on the page. It will help me to understand what you are talking about to add a section heading, identify the article you are concerned with, and use a link, (if your question or comment refers to a specific article), probably putting the article name in the heading, and sign your edit with four tildes (~~~~) so I know to whom to reply. Keep an eye on this page because I may just reply here if the answer is simple and does not seem to be time sensitive. When I notice an out of order question or comment, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is none already. Donner60 (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link and bracket bot notifications
I occasionally get one of these notices. I fix the link or bracket, then delete the message, as the messages state is permissible, instead of further cluttering up these pages. Donner60 (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Tahajjud
This is my first time so I have done something worth laughing your guts out then please do so.Anyway I am elatra and about the edits on Tahajjud I did not know about the honorifics so I am sorry about that,and I think the sentence construction should be "has been recorded performing",so none of us in my opinion is correct(maybe we could seek the attention of someone expert in grammar)...............................
(User:Elatra)
§
- My messages to you only concerned the honorifics. Otherwise, I am not sure whether you are concerned with the content or just the way it is written. In any event, I did not consider that to be an issue. I suggest you add a footnote if you wish to change the content. If you just wish to change the way it is written, you can do that, subject always to the Misplaced Pages policy that anyone else can edit an article, especially if they think your edit is wrong or not an improvement. They would be well advised to back it up with a good reason or a citation, as well. You can seek some advice at the Teahouse or other notice board if you wish but only for clarification, not because I have disputed your grammar. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Yeah thats a problem
The WHO document is biased. It does not give a good summary of the prepuce, its topic is not the prepuce it is HIV. Also, the clearance one is not supported by literature. Literature says that it is cleared from the surface of the penis not the body.
JohnP (talk) 22:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I left this message on your talk page: Since adequate explanation has been given for deletion of above message, I have done so in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through). I see you have already restored the edit so nothing remains to be done. I am sorry I misunderstood this. Donner60 (talk) 23:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
Hi Donner60. I saw that you undid one of my edits to the article Mariachi and I wanted to know why you fee it was not constructive. I feel you have made a mistake. Please explain, as I may revert the edit. Thanks 2602:306:36AF:7470:B561:7EE9:7A9D:676B (talk) 22:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
BEST,
see below
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mariachi— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- I left this message on your talk page. I am deleting the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because it appears I made a mistake in reverting the edit. Please check the caption when you restore it. Sorry for the inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
my last links
Donner60. Hi, the last edit I have made does seem to be constructive and assist any user visiting the page, I have viewed the guidelines and don't exactly see otherwise, can you explain? Thanks
- I left this message on your talk page: I am deleting the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because your questions shows you did not know about certain Misplaced Pages guidelines and I did not explain it to you. Please see See Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not, which includes, among other things, not a soapbox or means of promotion, a mirror or a repository of links, a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information. You will see that such a reference in the text of an article - advice to go to another web site - is not proper under several categories. Donner60 (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Stiernhielm
Stiernhielm's original name was Jöran (or Göran) Olofsson. When he was made noble he took the name Stiernhielm, he also "Internationalized" his first name as Georg. The name Göran originates from Georg(e)/Georgius. The spelling of his original first name varies: somtimes you see it as Jöran, other times as Göran (Both spellings have the same pronunciation). In Rune Pär Olofsson's book about Stiernhielm (1998; Georg Stiernhielm - diktare, domare, duellant) the spelling is Jöran, in the Swedish Misplaced Pages article the spelling is Göran. 85.229.0.138 (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- I left this message on your talk page: Thank you for the explanation. I am sorry for the delayed response but I have been offline since before you left your message. I am sorry I misunderstood your edit and I hope you will go ahead with your editing. I am deleting the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through). Donner60 (talk) 04:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
New Message: Bureau of Health Professions
Hi Donner60, I am writing to inquire the reason why my edits to the HRSA Bureau of Health Professions page was not accepted. You said my edits. "because it didn’t appear constructive." I was updating the agency webpage to reflect a recent change to the agency last year. In May 2014, the Bureau of Health Workforce was created, integrating HRSA workforce programs previously housed in two bureaus: Health Professions and Clinician Recruitment and Service. My intention to update the Health Professions page was to reflect the changes to this Bureau, including the Bureau name, which is now the Bureau of Health Workforce. I am a HRSA employee. Please let me know if there is anything I need to do to make these changes accepted. Thank you for your assistance. Roxane27 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.99.233.153 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.99.233.153 (talk)
- I left a reply on User talk:Roxane27 with suggestions and a welcome message. I deleted my initial message because of your explanation. I also left a welcome message which has some useful links about editing. I am sorry for any misunderstanding or inconvenience and hope you will continue to contribute to Misplaced Pages. Donner60 (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Ab (Semitic)
RE: Ab (Semitic) with this edit
Hey! Thank you, Donner60, for your message. Please notice, that I did in effect not removed content! I did place the "Jesus stuff" in it's context, that would be the Christianity section. The simple term abba is just a word denoting the english meaning father - there would be nothing more to say (exp. a wikia link?). The specialities about it's claimed/suggested use in "times of Jesus" are not universally representative under the heading "Aramaic" but better placed under "Christianity", wich I then did. The sources to the replaced text-block are christian as well, more or less commenting the christian use of "abba" or speculation, rather than a real ethymology and scientific theory about the use of "abba" in «times of Jesus» (what is this a kinda time anyways?). Good faith edit, I though the replacement was self-evident and the context-sensible replacement of a textblock to it's respect. sub was worthy a "minor edit (old: M.E.) statement. Sorry for stealing your time. Undid your revert, in good faith, though --85.181.118.117 (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I left the following message on your talk page along with a welcome message with some useful information: I am deleting the above message (my original message) in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because you explained it. Please use the Misplaced Pages:edit summary to briefly explain such edits because the intention in the removal of content, including its rearrangement, may not always be obvious. I am sorry for the misunderstanding. Donner60 (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Bureau of Health Professions
Hi Donner60, Thank you for your assistance. I took your suggestion to link to a new page for current and future information and leave old information on the old page. This seems like the fastest and easiest option. Roxane27 (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Rastafari Movement
Hi I was Wondering what edits you added to the Rastafari Movement Page, please reply as soon as possible Thank you in advance for your time. (signed by Mi Name Israel).
- I deleted ":)" from the page. That is all. If you look in the "View history" tab, you can find the edits of various users. Of course, if the page is long and the edit is old, it may take you a few minutes. Click "prev" next to the edit you wish to see and it will come up with the previous edit for comparison. Donner60 (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
One more question What did you delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mi name Israel (talk • contribs) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I deleted the characters :). Donner60 (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the terrible rock group The Styx
Hello. I believe that the characterization of Styx as a derivative, pretentious, cheesy, and self indulgent band is an accurate one and I don't think my edits should have been deleted.
- Please see Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not, especially Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Donner60 (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The Boy Next Door (film)
Im new to this.... look I will stop changing It but can u please and I mean PLEASE change the amount that the boy next door made cause everyone in there right mind knows that it didnt make no 100,000,000... thats my only problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by German elizabeth (talk • contribs) 02:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I left the following message on your talk page: Someone changed the number just as I was putting in the same number which was in the source. The links in the following message can help you to make proper edits to Misplaced Pages. (Welcome message followed; omitted here). Donner60 (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Absolute Music
The edit I made to this page was to revert a vandalizing edit someone had made earlier that day, changing 'A group of early Romantics' to 'A group of early League of Legends players'. I believe you have made a mistake by reinstating the edit I had reverted. 173.48.200.190 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- You are correct. I thought I was reverting the edit that you reverted. I am not sure how I made the mistake but I suppose I could have read the wrong column. Thanks for letting me know. Donner60 (talk) 04:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Why you are change my edit?
Why you are change my edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:CC01:3700:AC29:4933:8ED1:262D (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I left this message on your talk page: I am deleting the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because it was a mistake. I read the sequence wrong. You corrected the problem; you did not make it. I am sorry for the mistake and hope you will continue to edit Misplaced Pages. Donner60 (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Can you please upload an image?
I am a digital media manager for the school district and we need to replace a copyrighted image that someone mistakenly uploaded with the correct image. The incorrect patriot logo for the school, which is copyrighted by the New England Patriots, is on their page here now: https://en.wikipedia.org/Central_High_School_(Saint_Paul,_Minnesota)
The correct logo of the Patriot is here: https://central.spps.org/uploads/minutemanlogonewright.jpg
Thank you! Tmelhus (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)-troy.melhus@spps.org
- This is something I should know how to do but in fact I have never done it. Please see Misplaced Pages:Files for upload. This page includes not only instructions but links for asking for help or submitting a request which someone knowledgeable can act upon. Donner60 (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Appreciate the help — thanks. I have done a lot of editing but several years ago -- so apparently I need to edit a page more than 10 times and then I will have the ability to add images. So I may do some very minor tinkering on this page (some word rearrangement etc.) so that I meet that threshold. Thanks again for the help! Tmelhus (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Potsdam agreement
"XII. Orderly Transfer Of German Populations
The Three Governments, having considered the question in all its aspects, recognize that the transfer to Germany of German populations, or elements thereof, remaining in Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary, will have to be undertaken. They agree that any transfers that take place should be effected in an orderly and humane manner.
Since the influx of a large number of Germans into Germany would increase the burden already resting on the occupying authorities, they consider that the Control Council in Germany should in the first instance examine the problem, with special regard to the question of the equitable distribution of these Germans among the several zones of occupation. They are accordingly instructing their respective representatives on the Control Council to report to their Governments as soon as possible the extent to which such persons have already entered Germany from Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary, to submit an estimate of the time and rate at which further transfers could be carried out having regard to the present situation in Germany.
The Czechoslovak Government, the Polish Provisional Government and the Control Council in Hungary are at the same time being informed of the above and are being requested meanwhile to suspend further expulsions pending an examination by the Governments concerned of the report from their representatives on the Control Council."
The transfer of a whole population is called ethnic cleansing, you've never heard of it? 80.136.78.204 (talk) 04:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- I thank you for your explanation and citation. However, I think ethnic cleansing has the overtone of mass murder or at least extremely bad treatment. If any bad treatment was made, it was because of those making the transfers, not because the treaty required it. The treaty says these transfers should be made in "an orderly and humane manner." Also, the treaty asks that expulsions be suspended pending an examination by the governments concerned. I do not quarrel with your edit except for the use of the term ethnic cleansing. Can you make these edits without using that term? I think it would be less controversial, more accurate and stop any more questions. I also think it would be a good idea to cite the exact provision of the treaty and a reference to it (which you seem to have) so no one else raises this question. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- To clarify: Use of the term ethnic cleansing "according to the treaty". Perhaps it occurred as commonly understood, but not because the treaty required it. Donner60 (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Deleted original message on your talk page because of explanation provided and thanked for latest edit. Donner60 (talk) 04:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Senusret I
No need to worry about that article for now, because User:Favonian has semi-protected it, but yes, that was Ararat arev. His behavior lately has been to insert "Osiris-Orion son of Ra", or something similar, into articles, often forcing them clumsily into a sentence. It's a small part of his convoluted belief system, which puts Armenia at the center of everything. If you see those words, or similar ones, being inserted, don't hesitate to revert. When there's legitimate reason to explain the relationships in Egyptian religion between Osiris, Orion, and Ra, it should be done much more clearly, not in the cryptic and misleading way Ararat arev does it. A. Parrot (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Notability
Hi I'm sure your highly noteable for something but unfortunatley they didnt provide suitable references so it failed to meet WP:GNG ;). Amortias (T)(C) 03:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I am not sure about the first but must say that you are correct about failing to meet WP:GNG. Donner60 (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Not a Mistake
Unexplained content removal LaSalle, Illinois. There was an edit summary, I believe. Perhaps it was inadequate? I have since looked at edit summary and will be more concise in the future. Please tell me what you would like me to do, so that we may improve this article. --Etemtenem (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I left this message on your talk page: I have deleted the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because I made a mistake in reverting the edit and leaving the message. I have rolled back my reversion to your latest version. After a few days, I only can say that I must not have focused on the edit summary. If I had, I would have looked further into the article which was where your rewrite was placed. I am very sorry for the mistake and hope this will not discourage you from editing Misplaced Pages. Donner60 (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015: Való Világ
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Való Világ— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, not sure why you undid my changes. What I wrote is true, anyone can check it by visiting the official website of the show. I update this wiki article regularly, I was surprised this contribution was reverted. Rhymane (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2015 (GMT+1)
- I left this message on your talk page: I am deleting the above message in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through). Your message indicates to me that I did not understand your edit. You have stated that you regularly update this article so I will assume you are keeping it up in good faith. I must say that the edit did not appear to cover a likely event but I will defer to someone who regularly keeps up the article. Admittedly, I am not familiar with the show. I could only judge this on the words included. I could not check this further because the web site is not in English (Hungarian). Again, I will defer to your familiarity and suggest you go ahead with any edits which update the article. I am sorry for any inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- No worries Donner. It's good to know that people monitor the changes to prevent abuse. Have a nice day. Rhymane (talk) 10:06pm, 9 February 2015 (GMT+1) — Preceding undated comment added 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
In-line skating edit
(donenr60 sorry I couldnt find a way to message you another way so let me tell you something and that is im sorry for the inline skating edit i was just joking around and im sorry im editing this right now plz forgive my bad behavior:)) Kennethplaysmc
- Left reply and welcome template on user's talk page. Donner60 (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Sun News Network
Hi, I revised my comment on Sun Media that you removed. The Sun is a strongly conservative leaning news organization, and with a dwindling viewership with that mindset, they are no longer able to remain on air. Hope this is where it is supposed to reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djenning (talk • contribs) 03:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Please see Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a publisher of original thought, Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or means of promotion, Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view and Misplaced Pages:Citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Guy Fieri
Is this not reputable evidence? https://www.facebook.com/pages/Guy-Fieri-and-the-lead-singer-of-Smash-Mouth-are-the-same-person/291774550930662 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.19.116.235 (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- No. It seems to be a prank page. Also, none of the other sources give this information. Finally, such a Facebook page is not considered a reliable source for such information. See Misplaced Pages:Verifiability#Sources that are usually not reliable. Donner60 (talk) 03:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
newkifs
I would greatfully apreciate if you change it back for 5 minutes so I can screenshot it then I will be done. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newkifs (talk • contribs) 03:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- No, I can't put up information that I know is wrong, even for a few minutes. Donner60 (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Editing
Hey, Donner60. I noticed that, you removed most of the writing I did (I believe its reverting), an am just wondering if it wasn't constructive enough. There must have been something wrong with it, so I am asking for your advice on how I can improve it next time. Thanks for reading this! Nyse Vicente
- I should have explained this better. I will leave a message on your user talk page. Donner60 (talk) 18:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Joseph B. Soloveitchik
My edit wasn't a test. I was actually about to put up the citation.71.183.129.253 (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK. I deleted the message on your talk page and suggested you add the reference when you restore the edit. Sorry for any inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Pyrolysis-2/19
Hello. I do not understand why you find my contribution 'non-constructive' and reverted all of it back. I significantly expanded on the pyrolysis of car tires using several sources. The last edits were a bit repetitive because I was trying to tighten up my language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.129.106 (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was concerned about the non-English characters in the edit. I am not sure why these would be needed in the English Misplaced Pages. I should have explained that instead of using a template. Donner60 (talk) 03:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Non-English Characters? One of the academic sources I cited is in Thai and I translated to English. However, the rest of my sources are in English and so are my writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.129.106 (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have deleted my original message on your user talk page. When you restore the edit, I suggest you include this explanation in the footnote so that the origin and purpose is clear. Donner60 (talk) 03:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I have restored the edit. However I'm still a bit confused. Are you suggesting that I add it to the reference (I included a translation of the author and title)or the edit summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.129.106 (talk) 03:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have added the notation to the footnote. However, I notice that the reference is only to the University Department. Is this an article from a journal that could be cited or is it only on the University web site or in some other reference? Donner60 (talk) 03:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I am having trouble finding the copy I used. However, I found another copy at http://www.vcharkarn.com/varticle/408, which is an educational website, under 'academic journals' category. I'm not seeing where it is actually published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.129.106 (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- If the web site has the actual contents of the article which you relied upon, I see no reason not to cite the web site. It would be helpful if that also cited the original publication which you could mention as the source. Donner60 (talk) 04:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Noetics
Fallenangelius here – remember the wiki is not just a dictionary but a means for the world to share knowledge, experience, understanding and there are readers who will need explanation. I am sorry you were unable to understand my definition of Noetics but I was merely adding what was missing as the quotes are already there - but then I suppose you have to start somewhere! I am an academic and so much more – I must assume you are a PhD who has somehow managed to get by on quotes alone. If I were you I would avoid plagiarism lawsuits at all costs. I trust you are beginning to appreciate the beauty of pure “Noetic” thought which seems to be so elusive to so many! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallenangelius (talk • contribs) 23:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks; Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. Donner60 (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Given that Fallenangelius appears to be sincere, I have started a discussion of this addition on the talk page of the article so that we can figure this out. Your input is welcome. Iwilsonp (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- I left a comment on the talk page. Donner60 (talk) 20:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Given that Fallenangelius appears to be sincere, I have started a discussion of this addition on the talk page of the article so that we can figure this out. Your input is welcome. Iwilsonp (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Hello, Donner60. Please check your email; you've got mail!Message added 03:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
ceradon (talk • contribs) 03:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- New one! --ceradon (talk • contribs) 00:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Got it and replied. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hillside Colorado
Donner60
Please revert the edit you performed on this page. I own the town of Hillside and I placed the information on the Misplaced Pages page as a current assessment of where the town stands and its proximity to other areas in Colorado. If you would like to travel to Hillside and prove me wrong or take pictures and add your own comments I would be more than happy to host you, barring that, you do not have an understanding of this town to make any edits.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hillside colorado (talk • contribs) 14:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- In response to the above message and restoration of the original edit, I put the following message on your talk page: I won't leave another edit message because apparently you are unfamiliar with some Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. Misplaced Pages does not publish spam, advertising or promotional material. Please confine your editing to facts that do not fall within these categories. Please see Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or means of promotion and links and Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a directory and Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not#Misplaced Pages is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal#Travel guides. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Lalak Jan
to Donner 60 the editing you removed are taken out from different references and true base . i am mentioning the references u can check by your own self <ref>www.pakistanarmy.gov.pk</ref> pakistan officer <ref>Colonel Naeem Zaka (PA 18459)- 6 NLI</ref> book reference <ref> Books: Muhammad Ayub. An Army; Its role and Rule (A History of the Pakistan ArmyFrom Independence to Kargil 1947–1999). Rosedog Books, Pittsburg</ref> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waji rao (talk • contribs) 23:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- I left the following message on your talk page: I am deleting this message because you have cited references to me. However, you did not put these references into your edit. Please insert these citations in appropriate places in your edit if you are going to restore it. Also, please put your entire edit above the boxes at the bottom of the page. The links in the following welcome message should give you helpful information about citing sources and about Misplaced Pages formatting, policy and guidelines. One more thing the addition of "" is not understandable to me. Is this supposed to be some sort of reference? If so, it needs more explanation. Thank you. (Welcome message and links placed on your page but not repeated here.) Donner60 (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
THanks
For catching the markup copyedit issue at Laboratory Condensers. Cheers. Le Prof — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.56.201 (talk) 02:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Abomination of Desolation
I provided a reference which contains the reliable source. The 2nd King of Persia died from complications due to an automobile collision. His wife and mother stated concerning his incoherency, not me. When I got to him, he was breathing unconscious only out of one lung with heaving. The date is accurate and pans out to be in alignment with Feast Days in accord with other prophecy.
This is the second time the "Current Reckoning" has been vandalized. Please undo your error in judgment and see to it that it doesn't happen again.