| Revision as of 22:37, 28 February 2015 editAlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)11,178 edits →Page protection.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:40, 28 February 2015 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →{{la|Safety of electronic cigarettes}}: User:AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete numerous reliable sources. See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive864#User:AlbinoFerret for background information.Next edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ==Safety of electronic cigarettes== | ==Safety of electronic cigarettes== | ||
| Thank you for protecting the page. But the mammoth edits still remain. They were never discussed and most of them are part of an ongoing RFC. Rather than discuss the edits and come to consensus its been a revert them back in problem. Per ] major edits should be discussed, they never were even after removal. Letting them stay allows those that want to bypass consensus building just ignore any discussion. ] 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | Thank you for protecting the page. But the mammoth edits still remain. They were never discussed and most of them are part of an ongoing RFC. Rather than discuss the edits and come to consensus its been a revert them back in problem. Per ] major edits should be discussed, they never were even after removal. Letting them stay allows those that want to bypass consensus building just ignore any discussion. ] 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete reliable sources from position statements from reputable organisations. AlbinoFerret also deleted a number of sources including reviews without a specific objection on the talk page. See ]. Most editors disagree with AlbinoFerret at the RfC. See ]. User:Bbb23 blocked AlbinoFerret for violating the three-revert rule at the Safety of electronic cigarettes page. | |||
| :AlbinoFerret claims "Reliability does not guarantee inclusion." But AlbinoFerret has not given a specific reason for excluding relevant information about safety. AlbinoFerret has turned the page into a ]. AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete reliable sources. See ] for background information. ] (]) 22:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:40, 28 February 2015
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Emily Venter
The page LPK (https://en.wikipedia.org/LPK) was removed from wikipedia while I was in the process of updating it and providing references. Can you please reinstate and I will complete the requested changes?
Help?
Hello and thank you for your time. I am a bit new to Misplaced Pages, admittedly, and I believe I need your assistance on clearing up a few things. Back in August, you seemed to have disapproved something for my sorority's wiki page. I am attempting to re-create a page for our organization and per Wiki's instructions, I needed to reach out to you. This should be lifted, correct? 01:23, 9 August 2014 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Alpha Sigma Rho (Expired PROD, concern was: Can't find that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Deleted at AfD in 2011.) Please let me know the next steps to take to have the page re-instated. I believe there were not a lot of verifiable sources within the page, but I will find sources to contribute to our authenticity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha Sigma Rho Sorority (talk • contribs)
Restore Oslo (Microsoft) as user draft?
I'd like to take a shot at cleaning up the old, deleted article on the M/Oslo programming language for the Microsoft WikiProject. Would it be possible to get the article restored and moved into my user space so I can review its state and history, and hopefully get a decent article written (or at least a decent section on it in another appropriate page)? Thanks. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 20:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi coldacid. I've moved the article to your userspace. Regards, 22:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll start reviewing (and hopefully rewriting) tonight. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 23:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Page protection.
The justification is that I am an admin, you are an admin; if I tell you it's up to you, it's up to you. I thought that was being friendly enough. Shame you had to make an issue out of it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Kudpung, it is indeed a shame that an administrator feels that being an administrator is justification enough. Very well. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Safety of electronic cigarettes
Thank you for protecting the page. But the mammoth edits still remain. They were never discussed and most of them are part of an ongoing RFC. Rather than discuss the edits and come to consensus its been a revert them back in problem. Per WP:CAUTIOUS major edits should be discussed, they never were even after removal. Letting them stay allows those that want to bypass consensus building just ignore any discussion. AlbinoFerret 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete reliable sources from position statements from reputable organisations. AlbinoFerret also deleted a number of sources including reviews without a specific objection on the talk page. See Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes#Positions. Most editors disagree with AlbinoFerret at the RfC. See WP:SNOW. User:Bbb23 blocked AlbinoFerret for violating the three-revert rule at the Safety of electronic cigarettes page.
- AlbinoFerret claims "Reliability does not guarantee inclusion." But AlbinoFerret has not given a specific reason for excluding relevant information about safety. AlbinoFerret has turned the page into a WP:BATTLEGROUND. AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete reliable sources. See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive864#User:AlbinoFerret for background information. QuackGuru (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)