| Revision as of 18:15, 4 March 2015 editEditorous (talk | contribs)52 edits →March 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:23, 4 March 2015 edit undoNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits Warning: Edit warring on United States Merit Systems Protection Board. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> —]] 18:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> —]] 18:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] <sup>]</sup> 18:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:23, 4 March 2015
March 2015
Hello Knoveyor Beltless, Obviously you don't know squat about the corruption and failures of the MSPB or you work for the MSPB.
Hello, I'm Konveyor Belt. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to United States Merit Systems Protection Board because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. KonveyorBelt 17:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at United States Merit Systems Protection Board. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The reverted edit can be found here. KonveyorBelt 17:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KonveyorBelt 17:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
MSPB is a corrupt government agency that does virtually no legitimate work and in fact does the opposite of its mission.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at United States Merit Systems Protection Board, you may be blocked from editing. —SMALLJIM 17:55, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at United States Merit Systems Protection Board. —SMALLJIM 18:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at United States Merit Systems Protection Board. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN 18:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)