| Revision as of 20:22, 5 March 2015 editGB fan (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators103,303 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Coffee 1. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 20:28, 5 March 2015 edit undoHarry the Dirty Dog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,876 edits →March 2015: rm. not an edit war. Reverting vandalism by editor who has been warned (and block) for vandalism on this and other articles.Next edit → |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
{{busy}} |
|
{{busy}} |
|
|
|
|
== March 2015 == |
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] ] 20:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
