Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pincrete: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:38, 5 March 2015 editUrbanVillager (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,469 edits Revert war: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 23:22, 5 March 2015 edit undoPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,185 edits Revert warNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:


So, is that the name of the game? Everything I edit, you revert? Give it a rest, what is your purpose on Misplaced Pages if all you do is dispute everything? Try to be constructive, other editors want to make a contribution here as well, this is supposed to be fun. If you have issues, please deal with them outside of Misplaced Pages, it's really tiring having to argue about every single little edit I make to Malagurski-related articles. Just relax and try to contribute constructively, not attack and revert everything other editors do that's bigger than changing "live" into "life". When you thanked me for that edit, I thought this might be a new start (I don't remember you thanking me for anything, ever), but you're again trying to start a revert war. Please stop and let's try this differently, with more respect for one another. --] (]) 22:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC) So, is that the name of the game? Everything I edit, you revert? Give it a rest, what is your purpose on Misplaced Pages if all you do is dispute everything? Try to be constructive, other editors want to make a contribution here as well, this is supposed to be fun. If you have issues, please deal with them outside of Misplaced Pages, it's really tiring having to argue about every single little edit I make to Malagurski-related articles. Just relax and try to contribute constructively, not attack and revert everything other editors do that's bigger than changing "live" into "life". When you thanked me for that edit, I thought this might be a new start (I don't remember you thanking me for anything, ever), but you're again trying to start a revert war. Please stop and let's try this differently, with more respect for one another. --] (]) 22:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:], if this is a comment on content or sources, the proper place is the talk page, I have no idea from this message what your substantive point about either is. ] (]) 23:22, 5 March 2015 (UTC) ''ps I've thanked you quite a number of times actually, usually when you spot something I hadn't.''

Revision as of 23:22, 5 March 2015

His Dark Materials

Hi. Yes this is about the talk page not the article or the task force. Primarily see Talk:His Dark Materials#Editorial (in)activity and Archive 2. Meanwhile, for visibility I outdented both of your "old" contributions dated December 2012, and I inserted the subheading "Soul" (on which I hope to respond specifically and soon) between them.

Now this is about the task force Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Novels/His Dark Materials task force (which I won't be joining myself). I will look to tag it inactive (only 6 members and see its talk page!). If I find how to do so and do it, that may stimulate some response at the task force talk, or some response to you at the trilogy talk.

--P64 (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks!

Nice to be appreciated for doing something useful once in a while! danno_uk 19:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Weight of Chains

No worries. I tend to be move from article to article rather than stay in one place too long. I've been here long enough to get used to every type of character, there's little that fazes me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Deletions on City of London articles

Hello, I thought you might be interested that somebody has been deleting sections from City of London Corporation and City remembrancer. The anon IP refuses to engage in discussion when I've undone their edits, and has called the deleted parts "conspiracy theory", so I doubt they're acting in good faith. The page may well need balancing, but I don't think theor actions are helpful. Emma May Smith (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Hi Pincrete. Just a note to let you know the Sexuality of Adolf Hitler article has now been nominated for GA. Thanks again for your help in the clean-up. Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Revert war

So, is that the name of the game? Everything I edit, you revert? Give it a rest, what is your purpose on Misplaced Pages if all you do is dispute everything? Try to be constructive, other editors want to make a contribution here as well, this is supposed to be fun. If you have issues, please deal with them outside of Misplaced Pages, it's really tiring having to argue about every single little edit I make to Malagurski-related articles. Just relax and try to contribute constructively, not attack and revert everything other editors do that's bigger than changing "live" into "life". When you thanked me for that edit, I thought this might be a new start (I don't remember you thanking me for anything, ever), but you're again trying to start a revert war. Please stop and let's try this differently, with more respect for one another. --UrbanVillager (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

UrbanVillager, if this is a comment on content or sources, the proper place is the talk page, I have no idea from this message what your substantive point about either is. Pincrete (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2015 (UTC) ps I've thanked you quite a number of times actually, usually when you spot something I hadn't.