Revision as of 10:17, 20 July 2006 editSearchme (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,829 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:20, 21 July 2006 edit undoSamsara (talk | contribs)27,603 edits →[]: photo creditNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:<s>I ''think'' he meant a photo credit ].</s> ]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="#007FFF">]</font> 05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | :<s>I ''think'' he meant a photo credit ].</s> ]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="#007FFF">]</font> 05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
::The correct edit was made, just reverted. ]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="#007FFF">]</font> 10:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | ::The correct edit was made, just reverted. ]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="#007FFF">]</font> 10:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
I contacted Cyde about this yesterday, and he's definitely been "on", but hasn't replied, so I've put the photo credit back in. I hope it lasts. - ] (] • ]) 13:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:20, 21 July 2006
Portal:Biology
This portal has been around for a long time, receives regular updates, and has had a minor facelift and expansion recently with the addition of links to related portals and Mediawiki resources.
It's been a great portal for quite some time, but we've apparently never thought about nominating it, so here goes. Looking forward to your comments.
PS: Here is a version from February 2005, two weeks after it was created.
Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Object:
- Selected picture needs an image credit.
- No list of major topics.
- The "Alternative categorization schemes" box seems quite useless, but that might just be personal preference.
- Overall, though, quite good. Kirill Lokshin 16:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree that a box for the major topics is a must. Once that gets added, I'll probably be ready to support it.--ragesoss 17:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Photo credits have been added. The major topics box is there, but needs some cosmetic changes over the coming few days. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 23:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
I think he meant a photo credit like so.Joe I 05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)- The correct edit was made, just reverted. Joe I 10:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I contacted Cyde about this yesterday, and he's definitely been "on", but hasn't replied, so I've put the photo credit back in. I hope it lasts. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 13:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)