| Revision as of 23:49, 8 March 2015 editPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,185 edits Deleted unread … please don't revert other user's talk pages … please confine discussions to article talk pages and to content matters← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:43, 9 March 2015 edit undoUrbanVillager (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,469 edits →Deleting my messages to you: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| :Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, ] (]) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | :Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, ] (]) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Deleting my messages to you == | |||
| What's the matter? Did I uncover something you don't like? --] (]) 00:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:43, 9 March 2015
His Dark Materials
Hi. Yes this is about the talk page not the article or the task force. Primarily see Talk:His Dark Materials#Editorial (in)activity and Archive 2. Meanwhile, for visibility I outdented both of your "old" contributions dated December 2012, and I inserted the subheading "Soul" (on which I hope to respond specifically and soon) between them.
Now this is about the task force Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Novels/His Dark Materials task force (which I won't be joining myself). I will look to tag it inactive (only 6 members and see its talk page!). If I find how to do so and do it, that may stimulate some response at the task force talk, or some response to you at the trilogy talk.
--P64 (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks!
Nice to be appreciated for doing something useful once in a while! danno_uk 19:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Weight of Chains
No worries. I tend to be move from article to article rather than stay in one place too long. I've been here long enough to get used to every type of character, there's little that fazes me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Deletions on City of London articles
Hello, I thought you might be interested that somebody has been deleting sections from City of London Corporation and City remembrancer. The anon IP refuses to engage in discussion when I've undone their edits, and has called the deleted parts "conspiracy theory", so I doubt they're acting in good faith. The page may well need balancing, but I don't think theor actions are helpful. Emma May Smith (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Hi Pincrete. Just a note to let you know the Sexuality of Adolf Hitler article has now been nominated for GA. Thanks again for your help in the clean-up. Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleting my messages to you
What's the matter? Did I uncover something you don't like? --UrbanVillager (talk) 00:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)