Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:02, 11 March 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Wowee Zowee public, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to World AIDS Day. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Misplaced Pages
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Sam Walton (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Delta Airlines Flight 1086

The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that WP:GNG is met. Have a look at the Villa Castelli helicopter crash article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

The warning wasn't a message, it was a warning. Please stop removing warning templates from your userpage. It prevents uninvolved admins from being kept up to date. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Wowee Zowee public (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Blocking administrator: Coffee (talk)

Reviewing administrator: Chillum 20:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Request reason:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=This action is totally unjustified because I have shown great restraint. I have explained myself for hours and have held back the temptation to edit. In contrast, Coffee keeps slapping the same notice on my user talk page. This shows bad judgment by escalating, not de-escalating the situation. If unblocked, I will remain calm, even become calmer. By doing so, you will maintain order in WP, not try to create mayhem. As far as edit warring, Betty Logan reported me to the AN3 board but another editor came to my defense. That person (Jetstreamer) is not my friend but actually disagrees with me in an AFD but we are both civil and respectful. Since there is no edit warring, please delete Coffee's actions and unblock. Thank you. I will repay your kindness by making your action seem wise (i.e. I will act with the utmost respect and responsibility)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=This action is totally unjustified because I have shown great restraint. I have explained myself for hours and have held back the temptation to edit. In contrast, Coffee keeps slapping the same notice on my user talk page. This shows bad judgment by escalating, not de-escalating the situation. If unblocked, I will remain calm, even become calmer. By doing so, you will maintain order in WP, not try to create mayhem. As far as edit warring, Betty Logan reported me to the AN3 board but another editor came to my defense. That person (Jetstreamer) is not my friend but actually disagrees with me in an AFD but we are both civil and respectful. Since there is no edit warring, please delete Coffee's actions and unblock. Thank you. I will repay your kindness by making your action seem wise (i.e. I will act with the utmost respect and responsibility)|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}

Coffee, if you unblock me, it will show you are wise because I will be very respectful and act to show that your unblock was wise. Take up this offer because most Wikipedians are not so calm as I am. Having an iron fist may make you feel strong but is not the best way in this case. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Coffee says that I must keep his message up to keep uninvolved admins up to date. If you want to be up to date, know that the dispute started when Betty Logan attacked me. She/he wants a sanitized, whitewashed, 100% positive Sound of Music article while I wanted to convey that, according to reliable sources, they had a hard time finding a director because the industry thought the film was garbage. The nice thing was the public loved it. WP readers benefit in knowing this.

Burt Lancaster said "Jesus, you must need the money". Another director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying that he didn't want to director this kind of shit.

I have made many suggestions on different ways to say it and tone it down and make it neutral but to the hatred of Betty Logan. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Chillum, thank you for reviewing this. If you unblock me, you will be doing the right thing. I will give you honor by acting in the utmost upright way. This is the optimal WP way. The common WP way is to be harsh, but that just makes people mad creates drama. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

• Unblock on hold